Consent Order proposed for AlphaPet, Inc. due to environmental violations.
Official courthouse record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Published
- Category
- Other
- City
- Montgomery
Research context
What to do next
- 1
Review the Consent Order
AlphaPet, Inc. should carefully review the proposed Consent Order for compliance requirements.
- 2
Contact ADEM
Reach out to the Alabama Department of Environmental Management at (334) 271-7700 for clarification.
- 3
Prepare for Monitoring
Ensure all required components are monitored as per the regulations to avoid further violations.
Frequently asked questions
- What is a Consent Order?
- A Consent Order is a legal agreement to resolve violations without admitting guilt.
- What violations did AlphaPet, Inc. commit?
- They failed to monitor required components in their leak detection and repair program.
- Who issues a Consent Order?
- The Alabama Department of Environmental Management issues Consent Orders for environmental violations.
The suggestions and answers above are AI-generated for general information only. They can be wrong, and we don't take responsibility for their accuracy. Talk to a qualified professional before acting on them.
Full Notice Text
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT P O Box 301463 (Zip 36130-1463) 1400 Coliseum Boulevard (Zip 36110-2400) Montgomery, Alabama 36130-1463 (334) 271-7700 PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER Account Code: 350 Morgan County Pursuant to the provisions of the Alabama Environmental Management Act, Ala. Code §§22-22A-1 to 22-22A-17, as amended, the Alabama Department of Environmental Management is proposing to issue a Consent Order to AlphaPet, Inc., the owner/operator of a chemical manufacturing facility currently operating in Decatur, Morgan County, Alabama. The violations consisted of the failure to include and monitor one hundred (100) total components that should have been included in the facilities leak detection and repair (LDAR) program. These components include connectors and valves that contain at least 5% of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) by weight. The facility also failed to monitor an additional twenty-three (23) connectors within the regulatory required timeframe.