Court Filings

The Fifth District Court of Appeal granted Michael Anthony Foster, Jr.'s petition for a belated appeal. The court directed that this opinion be filed with the trial court and treated as the notice of appeal from the February 28, 2025 order that denied the defendant's motion for postconviction relief in Duval County Circuit Court case number 2023-CF-003421-A. The court acted under its original jurisdiction to permit Foster to proceed with an appeal despite the missed appellate deadline, citing the Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure that governs belated appeals.

The Fifth District Court of Appeal granted Jose Manuel Troche's petition for a belated appeal. The court directed that this opinion be filed with the trial court and treated as the notice of appeal from the December 15, 2025 order that denied Troche's postconviction motion in Hernando County Circuit Court case 2022-CF-000614-A. The grant restores Troche's right to pursue appellate review of the denial of postconviction relief under Florida appellate procedure.

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal granted Charles Jeffrey McPherson's petition for a belated appeal. The court ordered that this opinion be filed with the trial court and treated as the notice of appeal from the February 17, 2026 judgment and sentence in Clay County Circuit Court case number 10-2025-CF-874-A, under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(6)(D). The court issued its disposition without the State appearing and noted that the decision is not final until any timely authorized post-opinion motions are resolved.

The Court of Appeal granted Alonzo Devon Melson’s petition for habeas corpus and vacated his conviction for crimes arising from a 2017 gang-related shooting. The court found that two prosecution eyewitnesses gave trial testimony that was false about what they had told police after the shooting, and the prosecutor failed to correct those statements. Defense counsel at the retrial also failed to adequately prepare to impeach those witnesses. Under controlling precedent, the false testimony was material and the People did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt it did not contribute to the verdict.