What did the court decide?

The court affirmed the administrative agency's decisions and denied the appellant's challenge.

Who is affected by this decision?

Appellant Charles F. Cheleden and the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Community Association Management are directly affected; the agency's actions remain in place unless changed by a rehearing or further appeal.

The decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved; if rehearing is denied, the appellant may consider further appellate options where permitted.

Does the opinion explain the court's reasons?

No, this short per curiam entry does not provide a detailed explanation of the court's legal reasoning.

Charles F. Cheleden W v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation

Docket 4D2025-1015

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

AdministrativeAffirmed

Filed: Apr 30, 2026 · yesterday
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Administrative
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 4D2025-1015

Appeal from final agency actions of the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Community Association Management (administrative appeal).

Summary

The appellate court reviewed Charles F. Cheleden's appeal from final agency actions by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Community Association Management. After considering the record and briefs, the court unanimously affirmed the agency's decisions. The opinion is short and does not elaborate on legal reasoning in the published entry; it simply states the judgment affirming the agency. The decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.

Issue Decided

Whether the administrative decisions of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation should be overturned on appeal.

Court's Reasoning

The per curiam entry affirms the agency's determinations but provides no substantive opinion explaining the court's legal analysis. The affirmance indicates the court found no reversible error in the agency's proceedings or legal conclusions, and therefore declined to disturb the administrative outcomes. The brief entry does not identify specific rules or factual findings that controlled the result.

Parties

Appellant: Charles F. Cheleden
Appellee: State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Community Association Management
Attorney: Matthew Mears, Chief Appellate Counsel

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-30

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes there was an error of law or fact, they should timely file a motion for rehearing before the district court to preserve further review.
2
Consult appellate counsel
The appellant should consult with an attorney experienced in administrative appeals to evaluate grounds for rehearing or further appeal and to confirm applicable deadlines.
3
Monitor rehearing deadline and outcome
Track the deadline for a motion for rehearing and, if filed, monitor the court's disposition because the judgment is not final until that process concludes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The court affirmed the administrative agency's decisions and denied the appellant's challenge.
Who is affected by this decision?: Appellant Charles F. Cheleden and the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Community Association Management are directly affected; the agency's actions remain in place unless changed by a rehearing or further appeal.
What happens next?: The decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved; if rehearing is denied, the appellant may consider further appellate options where permitted.
Does the opinion explain the court's reasons?: No, this short per curiam entry does not provide a detailed explanation of the court's legal reasoning.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FOURTH DISTRICT

                       CHARLES F. CHELEDEN,
                            Appellant,

                                     v.

                   STATE OF FLORIDA,
  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
         COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT,
                        Appellee.

                           No. 4D2025-1015

                              [April 30, 2026]

   Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Business and
Professional Regulation; Community Association Management, L.T. Case
Nos. DBPR #2020-046642 and 2020-052266.

   Charles F. Cheleden, Deerfield Beach, pro se.

   Matthew Mears, Chief Appellate Counsel, Department of Business and
Professional Regulation, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and LOTT, JJ., concur.

                          *          *           *

   Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.