What did the court decide?

The appellate court affirmed the Department of Revenue's decision and did not reverse or modify it.

Who is affected by this decision?

The outcome affects the parties to the administrative matter: appellant Mikesha Chantae Johnson and the Department of Revenue (and indirectly Jevaun Shimoi Harvey).

Why is there no detailed explanation?

The court issued a short per curiam affirmance and cited the appellate rule, so it provided no published opinion or extended reasoning in this entry.

Can this decision be further appealed?

Possibly; the document notes the time remains open to file a motion for rehearing, and further appellate options may depend on Florida appellate rules and timely post-decision filings.

Mikesha Chantae Johnson v. Department of Revenue and Jevaun Shimoi Harvey

Docket 6D2025-3020

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

AdministrativeAffirmed

Filed: Apr 24, 2026 · 1 week ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Administrative
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 6D2025-3020

Appeal from an administrative decision of the Department of Revenue.

Summary

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the Department of Revenue's action in an appeal brought by Mikesha Chantae Johnson. The court issued a short per curiam ruling simply stating AFFIRMED and cited Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315. No written opinion or substantive reasoning is provided in the document; the judgment of the lower tribunal is therefore upheld. The decision was announced April 24, 2026, and participating judges concurred. Johnson proceeded pro se and the Department of Revenue was represented by the Attorney General's office.

Issue Decided

Whether the Department of Revenue's decision challenged by appellant Mikesha Chantae Johnson should be reversed

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a published opinion and cited the appellate rule for disposition, indicating that the panel found no basis to overturn the Department of Revenue's action. Because no further explanation is provided in the opinion, the court's conclusion rests on the record reviewed and the standard of review applied under the relevant Florida appellate procedure rule. The concise disposition indicates the appeal lacked merit sufficient to disturb the administrative determination.

Authorities Cited

Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315Fla. R. App. P. 9.315

Parties

Appellant: Mikesha Chantae Johnson
Appellee: Department of Revenue
Appellee: Jevaun Shimoi Harvey
Attorney: James Uthmeier, Attorney General
Attorney: Sarah C. Prieto, Assistant Attorney General
Judge: TRAVER, C.J.
Judge: BROWNLEE, J.
Judge: KAMOUTSAS, J.

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-24

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes an error occurred, she may timely file a motion for rehearing under Florida appellate rules to ask the court to reconsider.
2
Consult appellate counsel
Because the appeal was decided summarily, consult an attorney to evaluate grounds for rehearing or further appeal and to ensure timely filings.
3
Monitor appeal deadlines
Confirm the deadline for a motion for rehearing and any further appellate review, and calendar those dates to avoid forfeiture of remedies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appellate court affirmed the Department of Revenue's decision and did not reverse or modify it.
Who is affected by this decision?: The outcome affects the parties to the administrative matter: appellant Mikesha Chantae Johnson and the Department of Revenue (and indirectly Jevaun Shimoi Harvey).
Why is there no detailed explanation?: The court issued a short per curiam affirmance and cited the appellate rule, so it provided no published opinion or extended reasoning in this entry.
Can this decision be further appealed?: Possibly; the document notes the time remains open to file a motion for rehearing, and further appellate options may depend on Florida appellate rules and timely post-decision filings.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                        STATE OF FLORIDA
                       _____________________________

                           Case No. 6D2025-3020
                    Lower Tribunal No. 2025-DR-000171-O
                      _____________________________

                          MIKESHA CHANTAE JOHNSON,

                                   Appellant,
                                        v.

             DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and JEVAUN SHIMOI HARVEY,

                                   Appellees.
                       _____________________________

                    Appeal from the Department of Revenue.

                                 April 24, 2026

PER CURIAM.

      AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315.

TRAVER, C.J., and BROWNLEE and KAMOUTSAS, JJ., concur.


Mikesha Chantae Johnson, Orlando, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah C. Prieto, Assistant
Attorney General, of the Office of the Attorney General Child Support Enforcement,
Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee, Department of Revenue.

No Appearance for Appellee, Jevaun Shimoi Harvey.


 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
          AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED