What did the court decide?

The appellate court affirmed the order of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Review Board, meaning it rejected the appellant's challenge to that administrative decision.

Who is affected by this decision?

Orama’s Delivery Transport Corp is the appellant affected, and the Department of Transportation remains the prevailing party.

What happens next procedurally?

The decision is not final until any timely and authorized post-judgment motions under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331 are resolved; parties may move for rehearing or clarification within the time limits.

Can this decision be appealed further?

A further appeal to the Florida Supreme Court would require meeting the court's jurisdictional criteria, such as a certified question of great public importance; the entry does not address whether such review will be sought.

Orama's Delivery Transport Corp v. Department of Transportation

Docket 1D2025-0339

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

AdministrativeAffirmed

Filed: Apr 27, 2026 · 4 days ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Administrative
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 1D2025-0339

Appeal from an order of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Review Board.

Summary

The Florida First District Court of Appeal reviewed an appeal by Orama’s Delivery Transport Corp from an order of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Review Board involving the Florida Department of Transportation. The appellate court issued a brief per curiam decision on April 27, 2026, affirming the board's order. No extended opinion or reasoning appears in the published entry; the court simply affirmed the lower body's decision and noted concurrence by three judges. The decision is not final until any timely motions under Florida appellate rules are resolved.

Issue Decided

Whether the Commercial Motor Vehicle Review Board's order should be overturned on appeal to the district court

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is per curiam and provides no extended explanation; the court affirmed the Board's order without published analysis. The lack of published reasoning suggests the court found no reversible error in the administrative board's decision under applicable standards of review.

Parties

Appellant: Orama’s Delivery Transport Corp
Appellee: State of Florida Department of Transportation
Judge: Jeffery Frost, Chairman (Commercial Motor Vehicle Review Board)
Attorney: Mayron Diaz Gallardo (Gallardo Law Firm, P.A.)
Attorney: Rebekah A. Davis (General Counsel, Dept. of Transportation)
Attorney: Marc A. Peoples (Assistant General Counsel, Dept. of Transportation)

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-27

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing timely post-judgment motions
If the appellant believes there are grounds, it should evaluate and, if appropriate, file a motion for rehearing or clarification under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 within the rule deadlines.
2
Consult appellate counsel about further review
Discuss whether to seek discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court and whether any jurisdictional basis exists for further appeal.
3
Comply with the Board's order
If no further relief is sought or motions are denied, the appellant should comply with the underlying Commercial Motor Vehicle Review Board order affirmed by the court.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appellate court affirmed the order of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Review Board, meaning it rejected the appellant's challenge to that administrative decision.
Who is affected by this decision?: Orama’s Delivery Transport Corp is the appellant affected, and the Department of Transportation remains the prevailing party.
What happens next procedurally?: The decision is not final until any timely and authorized post-judgment motions under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331 are resolved; parties may move for rehearing or clarification within the time limits.
Can this decision be appealed further?: A further appeal to the Florida Supreme Court would require meeting the court's jurisdictional criteria, such as a certified question of great public importance; the entry does not address whether such review will be sought.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                        No. 1D2025-0339
                 _____________________________

ORAMA’S DELIVERY TRANSPORT
CORP,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________


On appeal from an order of the Commercial Motor Vehicle
Review Board.
Jeffery Frost, Chairman.


                        April 27, 2026

PER CURIAM.

    AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
               _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________


Mayron Diaz Gallardo, of Gallardo Law Firm, P.A, Miami, for
Appellant.

Rebekah A. Davis, General Counsel, and Marc A. Peoples,
Assistant General Counsel, Department of Transportation,
Tallahassee, for Appellee.




                            2