Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Pellet v. State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program

Docket 1D2025-3452

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

AdministrativeDismissed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Disposition
Dismissed
Docket
1D2025-3452

Petition for writ of prohibition filed in the appellate court's original jurisdiction challenging the Department of Revenue, Child Support Program.

Summary

The Florida First District Court of Appeal dismissed Terrence Pellet’s petition for a writ of prohibition seeking relief against the Florida Department of Revenue, Child Support Program. The petition was filed in the court’s original jurisdiction, and the per curiam order simply states the petition is dismissed without published opinion. All three judges concurred. No additional reasoning, factual findings, or relief were set forth in the decision.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the appellate court should issue a writ of prohibition against the Department of Revenue's Child Support Program.

Court's Reasoning

The opinion provides no substantive reasoning; it is a brief per curiam dismissal and does not explain the legal basis for dismissing the petition. Because the court gave no analysis, the operative reason for dismissal is not stated in the document.

Parties

Petitioner
Terrence Pellet
Respondent
State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program
Judge
Bilbrey, J.
Judge
Kelsey, J.
Judge
Winokur, J.

Key Dates

Decision date
2026-04-20

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consider filing a motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

    If there are grounds, the petitioner can file timely authorized motions noted by the court to seek further relief or reconsideration.

  2. 2

    Consult an attorney

    A lawyer can evaluate whether alternate remedies exist, whether the petition was procedurally deficient, and advise on next appropriate filings or appeals.

  3. 3

    Review procedural deficiencies

    If the dismissal was due to procedural defects (e.g., jurisdictional or form issues), correct those defects before filing a new petition or motion.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The court dismissed the petition for a writ of prohibition and issued no written opinion explaining the dismissal.
Who is affected by this decision?
The immediate parties are Terrence Pellet (the petitioner) and the Florida Department of Revenue, Child Support Program (the respondent).
What happens next for the petitioner?
The dismissal ends this original-jurisdiction petition; the petitioner may consider other remedies such as filing a different petition or seeking relief in another appropriate court if permitted.
Can this order be appealed?
Per the court's notation, the order is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331, so procedural motions may be available; further appeal options are limited given the summary dismissal.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                  _____________________________

                         No. 1D2025-3452
                  _____________________________

TERRENCE PELLET,

    Petitioner,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT
OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT
PROGRAM,

    Respondent.
                  _____________________________


Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.


                          April 20, 2026


PER CURIAM.

    DISMISSED.

BILBREY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
               _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________
Terrence Pellet, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.




                                  2