Seventy7, LLC v. Department of Revenue
Docket 1D2025-0532
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Administrative
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 1D2025-0532
Appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings
Summary
The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the decision of the Division of Administrative Hearings in a dispute between Seventy7, LLC and the Florida Department of Revenue. The appeal challenged an administrative ruling, but the appellate court, in a per curiam decision with three judges concurring, concluded the lower administrative decision should stand. The opinion contains only the disposition 'AFFIRMED' without published reasoning in this document.
Issue Decided
- Whether the Division of Administrative Hearings' decision concerning Seventy7, LLC and the Department of Revenue should be reversed or affirmed
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a brief per curiam disposition affirming the administrative decision. No substantive reasoning or legal analysis is included in the opinion text provided; the court simply stated the administrative determination was upheld and listed concurrence by the three judges.
Parties
- Appellant
- Seventy7, LLC
- Appellee
- Department of Revenue
- Judge
- Robert L. Kilbride (Administrative Law Judge)
- Attorney
- Jeanette Moffa
- Attorney
- Timothy E. Dennis
- Attorney
- Jacek P. Stramski
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-16
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider post-decision motions
If a party wishes to seek further review, they should consult counsel about filing a timely motion for rehearing or certification under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.
- 2
Review underlying record
Counsel for the appellant should review the administrative record and the Division's decision to determine whether grounds exist for further appellate relief.
- 3
Comply with administrative order
If the underlying administrative decision imposes obligations or penalties, the affected party should ensure compliance or timely pursue lawful avenues to challenge enforcement.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The court affirmed the prior administrative decision from the Division of Administrative Hearings.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- Seventy7, LLC (the appellant) and the Florida Department of Revenue (the appellee) are the directly affected parties.
- Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?
- No. The published text is a short per curiam opinion that only states 'AFFIRMED' and does not include detailed reasoning.
- Can this be appealed further?
- Potential further review (such as a motion for rehearing or discretionary review) may be available under Florida appellate rules; parties should consult counsel for deadlines and options.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2025-0532
_____________________________
SEVENTY7, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings.
Robert L. Kilbride, Administrative Law Judge.
April 16, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
ROBERTS, RAY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Jeanette Moffa of Moffa, Sutton, & Donnini, P.A., Fort Lauderdale,
for Appellant.
Timothy E. Dennis, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Jacek
P. Stramski, Special Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2