5307 CWELT-2008 v. Wells Fargo USA Holdings, Inc.
Docket 4D2025-1061
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 4D2025-1061
Appeal from a final judgment entered by the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County.
Summary
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment in favor of Wells Fargo USA Holdings, Inc. in an appeal brought by 5307 CWELT-2008. The appeal arose from a Broward County circuit court case (062016CA004032AXXXCE). The appellate panel issued a short per curiam opinion simply stating “Affirmed,” with no published opinion or extended reasoning included in the decision summary. The court noted the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.
Issue Decided
- Whether the trial court's judgment in favor of Wells Fargo should be reversed on appeal.
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is per curiam and contains no elaborated reasoning; the panel concluded the arguments raised by appellant did not merit reversal and therefore affirmed the lower court's judgment. Because no further explanation was provided, the court's action reflects its determination that the trial court's decision was correct or that any errors were not reversible. The brief disposition leaves the underlying factual and legal analysis in the trial court record.
Parties
- Appellant
- 5307 CWELT-2008
- Appellee
- Wells Fargo USA Holdings, Inc.
- Judge
- Gary Michael Farmer, Jr.
- Attorney
- Kenzie N. Sadlak
- Attorney
- Albert E. Acuna
- Attorney
- Stephen W. Guy
Key Dates
- Appellate decision date
- 2026-04-23
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes there are grounds, file a timely motion for rehearing in the Fourth District to preserve further appellate options.
- 2
Evaluate petition for further review
If rehearing is denied, consult counsel about seeking discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court and prepare any necessary petition within the applicable deadline.
- 3
Comply with trial-court judgment
If no further review is pursued or after appellate process concludes, take steps to comply with or enforce the trial court's judgment as applicable.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The court affirmed the trial court's judgment in favor of Wells Fargo, meaning the lower-court outcome stands.
- Does this decision take effect immediately?
- Not necessarily; the opinion states it is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.
- Who is affected by this ruling?
- The primary parties affected are the appellant, 5307 CWELT-2008, and the appellee, Wells Fargo USA Holdings, Inc., because the appellate court left the trial-court result in place.
- Can the appellant seek further review?
- The appellant may seek rehearing in the district court or, if applicable, discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court, subject to rules and deadlines.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
5307 CWELT-2008,
Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO USA HOLDINGS, INC.,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-1061
[April 23, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Gary Michael Farmer, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No.
062016CA004032AXXXCE.
Kenzie N. Sadlak of Kenzie N. Sadlak, PA, Miami, for appellant.
Albert E. Acuna of Albert E. Acuna, PA, Miami, and Stephen W. Guy of
Krapf Legal, Clearwater, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.