A&J Capital Inc. F/K/A A&J Capital Investment, Inc. v. HC CBA, LLC
Docket 4D2025-2534
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 4D2025-2534
Appeal from a nonfinal order of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
Summary
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a nonfinal circuit-court order in a civil dispute between A&J Capital Inc. (appellant) and HC CBA, LLC (appellee). The opinion is per curiam, issued April 30, 2026, and provides no extended reasoning in the published entry. The appellate panel unanimously affirmed the lower court's nonfinal order, leaving any further relief dependent on timely post-opinion motions. The opinion is not final until resolution of any timely motion for rehearing.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's nonfinal order should be reversed on appeal
Court's Reasoning
The per curiam opinion provides no detailed reasoning in the published entry; the panel considered the appeal and unanimously concluded that the circuit court's nonfinal order should be affirmed. Because the opinion is terse, the court did not set out the legal rule or factual analysis in this entry and instead issued a summary disposition affirming the lower court.
Parties
- Appellant
- A&J Capital Inc., f/k/a A&J Capital Investment Inc.
- Appellee
- HC CBA, LLC
- Judge
- John B. Bowman
- Attorney
- Henry H. Bolz, IV
- Attorney
- Aaron C. Jackson
- Attorney
- Jordan Alexander Shaw
- Attorney
- Zachary Dean Ludens
- Attorney
- Lauren Nicole Palen
Key Dates
- Appellate decision date
- 2026-04-30
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If a party believes there are grounds, they should file a timely motion for rehearing in the Fourth District, since the opinion states it is not final until rehearing is resolved.
- 2
Proceed in the trial court under the affirmed order
Counsel should review the affirmed nonfinal order and continue any trial-court proceedings or compliance required by that order unless rehearing is granted.
- 3
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If further appellate options exist or a strategy is warranted, counsel should evaluate whether to seek additional appellate relief or preserve issues for appeal from a final judgment.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The court affirmed the circuit court's nonfinal order, meaning it found no reversible error in that order based on the materials in this short opinion.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The parties to the appeal, A&J Capital Inc. (appellant) and HC CBA, LLC (appellee), are directly affected; the underlying case in Broward County proceeds consistent with the affirmed nonfinal order.
- Does this opinion end the case?
- No. The opinion affirms a nonfinal order and the entry notes it is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved; further proceedings in the trial court may continue.
- Can this decision be further appealed?
- Potential further appellate review may be limited because this affirms a nonfinal order; parties can seek rehearing in this court or may appeal final judgments later depending on the case posture.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
A&J CAPITAL INC., f/k/a
A&J CAPITAL INVESTMENT INC.,
Appellant,
v.
HC CBA, LLC,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2534
[April 30, 2026]
Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth
Judicial Circuit, Broward County; John B. Bowman, Judge; L.T. Case No.
062024CA012157AXXXCE.
Henry H. Bolz, IV, and Aaron C. Jackson of Polsinelli PC, Miami, for
appellant.
Jordan Alexander Shaw, Zachary Dean Ludens, and Lauren Nicole
Palen of Shaw Lewenz, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CIKLIN, CONNER and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.