What did the appeals court decide?

The appeals court affirmed the lower court's judgment, meaning it left the circuit court's decision unchanged.

Who is affected by this decision?

The parties to the appeal—Chad R. Baldwin and the estate and family-member appellees—are directly affected because the circuit court's judgment remains in force.

Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?

No; the opinion is a short per curiam entry that states only 'Affirmed' and does not provide detailed reasoning.

Can this decision be appealed further?

A party may seek further review, typically by filing a motion for rehearing in the district court or a discretionary petition to the Florida Supreme Court, subject to applicable deadlines and jurisdictional rules.

Baldwin v. Estate Of: Emma Jean Baldwin, Baldwin

Docket 2D2025-2865

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed

Filed: Apr 17, 2026 · 2 weeks ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 2D2025-2865

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County

Summary

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court's decision in a dispute involving members and the estate of Emma Jean Baldwin. The appeal was brought pro se by Chad R. Baldwin against the estate and several relatives. The appellate court issued a short per curiam opinion stating only 'Affirmed' without published reasoning, and the panel of three judges concurred. The decision leaves the lower court's judgment intact and ends this stage of appellate review.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court's judgment involving the estate and family members should be reversed or modified on appeal

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is a brief per curiam affirmance and provides no substantive reasoning in the published entry. Because the appellate court affirmed, it necessarily concluded that the appellant did not show reversible error in the circuit court's proceedings or judgment. No additional legal analysis or factual findings are provided in the opinion.

Parties

Appellant: Chad R. Baldwin
Appellee: Estate of Emma Jean Baldwin c/o Richardson Ladd Baldwin as Personal Representative
Appellee: Kyle Dorolette Baldwin
Appellee: Richardson Ladd Baldwin
Appellee: Jody Jean Baldwin/Durham
Judge: Catherine Catlin
Attorney: David C. Jordan

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-17

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult counsel about further review
If the appellant wishes to continue, they should consult an attorney immediately about filing a motion for rehearing or a petition for discretionary review to the Florida Supreme Court and confirm applicable deadlines.
2
Comply with the circuit court judgment
Parties affected by the underlying judgment should take steps to comply with any directives or orders from the circuit court now that the appellate court has affirmed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The appeals court affirmed the lower court's judgment, meaning it left the circuit court's decision unchanged.
Who is affected by this decision?: The parties to the appeal—Chad R. Baldwin and the estate and family-member appellees—are directly affected because the circuit court's judgment remains in force.
Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?: No; the opinion is a short per curiam entry that states only 'Affirmed' and does not provide detailed reasoning.
Can this decision be appealed further?: A party may seek further review, typically by filing a motion for rehearing in the district court or a discretionary petition to the Florida Supreme Court, subject to applicable deadlines and jurisdictional rules.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                        SECOND DISTRICT


                            CHAD R. BALDWIN,

                                 Appellant,

                                      v.

         ESTATE OF EMMA JEAN BALDWIN c/o RICHARDSON
          LADD BALDWIN as Personal Representative; KYLE
        DOROLETTE BALDWIN; RICHARDSON LADD BALDWIN;
               and JODY JEAN BALDWIN/DURHAM,

                                 Appellees.

                             No. 2D2025-2865



                               April 17, 2026

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Catherine Catlin,
Judge.

Chad R. Baldwin, pro se.

David C. Jordan of David C. Jordan, PLLC, Land O' Lakes, for Appellees.



PER CURIAM.

      Affirmed.

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.