Bidbumpers, LLC and Christian C. Carmona v. Lobel Financial Corp.
Docket 4D2025-2312
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 4D2025-2312
Appeal from a county court judgment in Broward County (L.T. Case No. 062025CC000800AXXXCE).
Summary
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal reviewed an appeal by Bidbumpers, LLC and Christian C. Carmona from a Broward County Court decision involving Lobel Financial Corp. The appellate court, in a per curiam decision, affirmed the lower court's judgment. No extended opinion, reasoning, or change to the trial court's disposition was published; the mandate is subject to possible change if a timely motion for rehearing is filed.
Issues Decided
- Whether the county court's judgment should be reversed on appeal by Bidbumpers, LLC and Christian C. Carmona.
- Whether any error in the county court proceedings warranted relief from Lobel Financial Corp.
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a short per curiam disposition affirming the lower court's judgment without publishing an extended opinion; the panel offered no new legal analysis and therefore relied on the correctness of the county court's ruling. Because no further reasoning was provided, the affirmation indicates the appellate court found no reversible error in the proceedings below. The judgment remains subject to change if a timely motion for rehearing is filed.
Parties
- Appellant
- Bidbumpers, LLC
- Appellant
- Christian C. Carmona
- Appellee
- Lobel Financial Corp.
- Judge
- Mardi Levey Cohen
- Attorney
- Michael Howard Wolf
- Attorney
- Bruce Eric Bloch
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-30
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing motion for rehearing
Appellants who believe there are grounds should consult counsel about filing a timely motion for rehearing in the appellate court to seek reconsideration.
- 2
Prepare for mandate and enforcement
If no rehearing is filed or it is denied, parties should prepare for the appellate mandate and take or defend any enforcement steps in the county court as appropriate.
- 3
Consult appellate counsel
Both sides should consult their attorneys to determine whether further appellate options exist and to plan immediate next steps consistent with deadlines.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The appeals court affirmed the county court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error in the lower court's ruling.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The decision directly affects the parties: appellants Bidbumpers, LLC and Christian C. Carmona, and appellee Lobel Financial Corp.
- Can this decision be changed?
- Yes—because the opinion notes the judgment is not final until resolution of any timely motion for rehearing, a rehearing could alter the outcome.
- What happens next procedurally?
- If no timely motion for rehearing is filed or if such a motion is denied, the appellate court will issue its mandate and the county court judgment will remain affirmed.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
BIDBUMPERS, LLC, and CHRISTIAN C. CARMONA,
Appellants,
v.
LOBEL FINANCIAL CORP.,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2312
[April 30, 2026]
Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Mardi Levey Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No.
062025CC000800AXXXCE.
Michael Howard Wolf of Michael H. Wolf, Fort Lauderdale, for
appellants.
Bruce Eric Bloch of Bruce E. Bloch, P.A., Miami, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LEVINE, CONNER and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.