What did the appeals court decide?

The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision, meaning it found no reversible error and left the trial court's ruling in place.

Who is affected by this decision?

The immediate parties affected are BISK Education, Inc. (the appellant) and FSOI, LLC (the appellee); the decision maintains whatever rights or obligations were established by the trial court.

Does this opinion explain why the court affirmed?

No substantive reasoning or factual explanation appears in the published entry beyond a per curiam affirmance and concurrence by the panel.

Can this decision be appealed further?

If a party seeks further review, the usual next step would be to seek discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court, subject to the court's rules and time limits.

Bisk Education, Inc. v. FSOI, LLC, Rupp

Docket 2D2025-0177

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed

Filed: May 1, 2026 · today
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 2D2025-0177

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County

Summary

The Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment in a dispute between BISK Education, Inc. (appellant) and FSOI, LLC (appellee). The appeal was taken from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County before Judge Helene L. Daniel. The appellate panel issued a per curiam decision on May 1, 2026, concluding that the lower court's ruling should stand. No extended reasoning or factual details are provided in the published entry beyond the affirmation and the judges' concurrence.

Parties

Appellant: BISK Education, Inc
Appellee: FSOI, LLC
Judge: Helene L. Daniel

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-05-01

What You Should Do Next

1
Review the trial court record and opinion
Counsel for the appellant should obtain the full opinion, trial record, and any written orders to determine the grounds (if any) for further review or motion.
2
Consider petitioning the Florida Supreme Court
If there are substantial questions of state law or conflict with other decisions, the appellant may consider filing a jurisdictional brief seeking discretionary review within the deadline set by Florida appellate rules.
3
Advise the client on enforcement or compliance
The prevailing party should take steps to enforce the trial court judgment or to close any outstanding matters, and the losing party should assess compliance obligations and potential remedies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision, meaning it found no reversible error and left the trial court's ruling in place.
Who is affected by this decision?: The immediate parties affected are BISK Education, Inc. (the appellant) and FSOI, LLC (the appellee); the decision maintains whatever rights or obligations were established by the trial court.
Does this opinion explain why the court affirmed?: No substantive reasoning or factual explanation appears in the published entry beyond a per curiam affirmance and concurrence by the panel.
Can this decision be appealed further?: If a party seeks further review, the usual next step would be to seek discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court, subject to the court's rules and time limits.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                        SECOND DISTRICT




                          BISK EDUCATION, INC,

                                 Appellant,

                                      v.

                                 FSOI, LLC,

                                  Appellee.

                             No. 2D2025-0177



                                May 1, 2026

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Helene L. Daniel,
Judge.

Kristin A. Norse, Robert W. Ritsch, and Brandon K. Breslow of Kynes,
Markman & Felman, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Samuel J. Salario, Jessica Slatten, and Brian M. Trujillo of Lawson Huck
Gonzalez, PLLC, Tampa, for Appellee.


PER CURIAM.

      Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.


Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.