What did the appeals court decide?

The court affirmed the county court's judgment and did not provide a detailed written opinion; the decision was issued per curiam.

Who is affected by this decision?

The parties to the appeal—appellant Bridge Golde and appellee Bangladesh Gardens, LLC—are directly affected; the county court's judgment stands as affirmed.

What does citing Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) mean?

It indicates the appellate court used a procedure that allows a short-form opinion or summary disposition without extensive written reasoning.

Can this decision be challenged further?

A motion for rehearing may be filed within the deadline specified by the appellate rules; if rehearing is denied, further review (such as a discretionary review) may require additional procedural steps and standards.

Bridge Golde v. Bangladesh Gardens, LLC

Docket 6D2026-0855

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed

Filed: Apr 24, 2026 · 1 week ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 6D2026-0855

Appeal from a county court judgment in Glades County reviewed by the Sixth District Court of Appeal

Summary

The Sixth District Court of Appeal reviewed an appeal by Bridge Golde from a Glades County County Court decision. The appellate court, in a brief per curiam order, affirmed the lower court's decision and cited Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). All three judges concurred. The appellant proceeded pro se and the appellee did not appear. The opinion is short-form and finality is subject to the time for filing a motion for rehearing.

Issue Decided

Whether the county court's judgment should be reversed on appeal (specific issues not detailed in the opinion).

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a short per curiam order affirming the lower court and relied on the procedural authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). Because the opinion is terse and does not elaborate factual or legal analysis, the affirmation appears to rest on the rule-authorized summary disposition without further written explanation.

Authorities Cited

Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a)Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a)

Parties

Appellant: Bridge Golde
Appellee: Bangladesh Gardens, LLC
Judge: William Dorman, III
Judge: TRAVER, C.J.
Judge: STARGEL
Judge: PRATT

Key Dates

Appellate decision date: 2026-04-24

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes the court overlooked legal points or made an error, they should file a motion for rehearing within the time limits set by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
2
Consult an attorney about further review
If rehearing is denied, consult counsel promptly to evaluate whether to seek further review in the Florida Supreme Court and to assess the merits and deadlines.
3
Comply with the affirmed county court judgment
Absent a successful rehearing or further appeal, the appellant should comply with the county court's judgment and any associated enforcement actions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The court affirmed the county court's judgment and did not provide a detailed written opinion; the decision was issued per curiam.
Who is affected by this decision?: The parties to the appeal—appellant Bridge Golde and appellee Bangladesh Gardens, LLC—are directly affected; the county court's judgment stands as affirmed.
What does citing Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) mean?: It indicates the appellate court used a procedure that allows a short-form opinion or summary disposition without extensive written reasoning.
Can this decision be challenged further?: A motion for rehearing may be filed within the deadline specified by the appellate rules; if rehearing is denied, further review (such as a discretionary review) may require additional procedural steps and standards.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                        STATE OF FLORIDA
                        _____________________________

                              Case No. 6D2026-0855
                        Lower Tribunal No. 2025-CC-000198
                         _____________________________

                                 BRIDGE GOLDE,

                                   Appellant,

                                        v.

                           BANGLADESH GARDENS, LLC,

                                    Appellee.

                        _____________________________

                Appeal from the County Court for Glades County.
                          William Dorman, III, Judge.

                                  April 24, 2026

PER CURIAM.

      AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and PRATT, JJ., concur.


Bridge Golde, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
          AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED