Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Carlos A. Zarraluqui, Esq. v. Fetes & Events, Inc.

Docket 3D2024-2042

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Case type
Civil
Disposition
Affirmed
Docket
3D2024-2042

Appeal from a non-final order of the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County in a civil action (Lower Tribunal No. 23-28858-CA-01).

Summary

The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a non-final circuit court order in a civil case between appellant Carlos A. Zarraluqui and appellees Fetes & Events, Inc., et al. The appeal arose from a 2023 Miami-Dade County proceeding and was argued by counsel for both sides. The appellate court issued a brief per curiam decision, simply stating 'Affirmed,' without published opinion or extended reasoning in this document. The judgment affirms the lower court's non-final ruling, and the mandate will follow after disposition of any timely motion for rehearing.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the circuit court's non-final order should be reversed on appeal.

Court's Reasoning

The opinion issued here is a brief per curiam affirmance and does not include the court's detailed reasoning in this document. By affirming, the appellate court concluded the appellant failed to show error in the non-final order below. Any specific legal analysis or factual application is not provided in the published entry.

Parties

Appellant
Carlos A. Zarraluqui, Esq.
Appellee
Fetes & Events, Inc.

Key Dates

Opinion filed
2026-04-29

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consider filing a motion for rehearing

    If the appellant believes the panel overlooked controlling law or made an error, file a timely motion for rehearing in the Third District to preserve arguments and possibly delay issuance of mandate.

  2. 2

    Evaluate further appellate remedies

    If rehearing is denied, consult counsel promptly about seeking discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court and verify applicable filing deadlines.

  3. 3

    Proceed in the trial court as appropriate

    Because the order was non-final, coordinate with trial counsel to pursue or defend further proceedings in the circuit court consistent with the affirmed ruling.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appellate court decide?
The appellate court affirmed the lower court's non-final order, so the trial court's ruling remains in effect.
Does this end the case?
No — the order was non-final and the opinion notes that the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved; further proceedings in the trial court may continue.
Can the appellant seek further review?
The appellant may seek rehearing in the Third District and, if eligible, may seek discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court, subject to applicable deadlines and standards for review.
Why did the court affirm?
The published entry is a short per curiam affirmance and does not state the court's detailed reasons; it indicates the appellant did not persuade the appellate panel that reversal was warranted.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                         Opinion filed April 29, 2026.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D24-2042
                   Lower Tribunal No. 23-28858-CA-01
                          ________________


                     Carlos A. Zarraluqui, Esq.,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                     Fetes & Events, Inc., et al.,
                                 Appellees.


     An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade
County, William Thomas, Judge.

     Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton, LLP, and Jorge L. Piedra and
Katherine A. Mitchell, for appellant.

     Gunster and Michael B. Green and Lawrence G. Horsburgh and
Jonathan K. Osborne, for appellees.


Before SCALES, C.J., and LOGUE and LOBREE, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.

     Affirmed.