Cornelison v. Enterprise Leasing Company South Central, LLC, Enterprise Car Sales
Docket 1D2024-2767
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 1D2024-2767
Appeal from a circuit court decision in Escambia County
Summary
The Florida First District Court of Appeal reviewed an appeal by Robin Cornelison from a decision of the Circuit Court of Escambia County against Enterprise Leasing Company South Central, LLC d/b/a Enterprise Car Sales. The appellate court issued a short, per curiam opinion on April 30, 2026 and affirmed the lower court's decision. No opinion text or reasoning beyond the single-word disposition was included in the published entry; the court simply announced 'AFFIRMED' and the three judges concurred.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's judgment or order (as appealed by appellant Robin Cornelison) should be reversed
Court's Reasoning
The published entry contains only a per curiam announcement of disposition and does not state the court's factual or legal reasoning. The court affirmed the lower court's decision without an opinion, indicating the appellate panel found no reversible error in the circuit court's ruling.
Parties
- Appellant
- Robin Cornelison
- Appellee
- Enterprise Leasing Company South Central, LLC d/b/a Enterprise Car Sales
- Judge
- Amy P. Brodersen
- Attorney
- Brian J. Lee (Morgan & Morgan) for Appellant
- Attorney
- Katlin C. Cravatta (Foley & Lardner LLP)
- Attorney
- Caroline Dunkle Royce (Foley & Lardner LLP)
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-30
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Check for timely post-judgment motions
Confirm whether any motions under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 were or should be filed to preserve further review, and note applicable deadlines.
- 2
Consider seeking further review
If appropriate and jurisdictional criteria are met, evaluate whether to file a petition for review to the Florida Supreme Court and prepare required filings promptly.
- 3
Consult appellate counsel
Discuss with your attorney the implications of the affirmance and whether any procedural or substantive avenues remain for relief.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court's decision; the opinion contains only the single-word disposition 'AFFIRMED.'
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The parties to the appeal are appellant Robin Cornelison and appellee Enterprise Leasing Company South Central, LLC d/b/a Enterprise Car Sales; the circuit court's judgment in that case remains in effect.
- Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?
- No. The entry is a per curiam affirmance without an accompanying explanation or legal analysis.
- Can this decision be further appealed?
- Possibly; the decision notes it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331, and a petition for review to the Florida Supreme Court may be available depending on jurisdictional rules and deadlines.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2024-2767
_____________________________
ROBIN CORNELISON,
Appellant,
v.
ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY
SOUTH CENTRAL, LLC D/B/A
ENTERPRISE CAR SALES,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
Amy P. Brodersen, Judge.
April 30, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Brian J. Lee of Morgan & Morgan, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Katlin C. Cravatta of Foley & Lardner LLP, Orlando, and Caroline
Dunkle Royce of Foley & Lardner LLP, Tampa, for Appellee.
2