Cramer v. Walker
Docket 2D2025-0580
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2025-0580
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County
Summary
The appellate court reviewed an appeal by Stephanie Candace Moure Cramer from a Sarasota County circuit court decision in a dispute against Brendan Walker. The Second District issued a brief per curiam opinion on April 29, 2026, concluding only that the lower court's judgment should be affirmed. No published reasoning, factual background, or legal analysis appears in the opinion beyond the single-word disposition and concurrence by all three judges, and the opinion is subject to revision before official publication.
Parties
- Appellant
- Stephanie Candace Moure Cramer
- Appellee
- Brendan Walker
- Judge
- Maria Ruhl
- Attorney
- Jaclyn Soroka
- Attorney
- Shanna Hourihan
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-29
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Review mandate and judgment
Confirm the circuit court's final judgment and any mandate to determine outstanding obligations, enforcement steps, or case closure requirements.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If the appellant wishes to pursue further review, consult counsel immediately to evaluate grounds for seeking discretionary review and to meet any filing deadlines.
- 3
Prepare to comply or enforce
The prevailing party should prepare to enforce the affirmed judgment; the losing party should prepare to comply or seek any postjudgment relief available in the trial court.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision and denied the appellant's challenge.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The parties to the appeal—Appellant Stephanie Cramer and Appellee Brendan Walker—are directly affected; the lower-court judgment stands as affirmed.
- Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?
- No. The published entry is a short per curiam affirmance without substantive explanation of the court's legal reasoning.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- Possibly. Parties may seek discretionary review by a higher court (such as the Florida Supreme Court) if applicable, subject to timing and jurisdictional rules; consult counsel for deadlines.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
STEPHANIE CANDACE MOURE CRAMER,
Appellant,
v.
BRENDAN WALKER,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-0580
April 29, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Maria Ruhl, Judge.
Jaclyn Soroka of Betras Kopp, LLC, Lakewood Ranch, for Appellant.
Shanna Hourihan of Shanna Hourihan Law, LLC, Bradenton, for
Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.