Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Florida Insurance Guaranty Association v. A&B Verma Family, LLC

Docket 5D2025-1343

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Case type
Civil
Disposition
Affirmed
Docket
5D2025-1343

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County

Summary

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision in a dispute between the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association (appellant) and A & B Verma Family, LLC (appellee). The appeal arose from a Volusia County circuit court ruling; the appellate panel issued a brief per curiam opinion affirming the lower court's judgment without published opinion. All three judges concurred. The mandate notes that the decision is not final until any timely post-judgment motions under Florida appellate rules are resolved.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the circuit court's judgment in favor of A & B Verma Family, LLC should be reversed by the Fifth District Court of Appeal.

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a per curiam affirmance, indicating the appellate panel found no reversible error in the trial court's ruling. The brief opinion does not state detailed legal reasoning, suggesting the appeal lacked merit or raised no substantial question warranting reversal. Because the opinion is unelaborated, the court relied on the record and applicable law to conclude the lower court's judgment should stand.

Parties

Appellant
Florida Insurance Guaranty Association
Appellee
A & B Verma Family, LLC
Judge
Michael Scott Orfinger
Attorney
Michael R. D’Lugo
Attorney
Andrew A. Steadman

Key Dates

Decision date
2026-04-28

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consider post-judgment motions

    The appellant should evaluate whether to file timely motions under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 to seek rehearing or certification for conflict.

  2. 2

    Consult appellate counsel about further review

    If grounds exist, counsel can advise on seeking discretionary review from the Florida Supreme Court or other extraordinary relief and prepare any required jurisdictional filings.

  3. 3

    Prepare to implement the lower court judgment

    If no further review or motions are pursued, the prevailing party should take steps to enforce or execute the circuit court's judgment as affirmed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?
The appeals court affirmed the trial court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error and left the lower court's decision intact.
Who is affected by this decision?
The immediate parties—Florida Insurance Guaranty Association (appellant) and A & B Verma Family, LLC (appellee)—are affected, as the appellee's victory in the circuit court remains in place.
Does this mean the case is completely over?
Not necessarily; the opinion notes the decision is not final until any timely and authorized post-judgment motions under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331 are resolved.
Can the appellant seek further review?
Potential further steps include filing authorized post-judgment motions or seeking review by the Florida Supreme Court if a basis for jurisdiction exists; deadlines and standards for such actions are governed by Florida appellate rules.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                     Case No. 5D2025-1343
                 LT Case No. 2021-10573-CIDL
                 ____________________________

FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY
ASSOCIATION,

    Appellant,

    v.

A & B VERMA FAMILY, LLC,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County.
Michael Scott Orfinger, Judge.

Michael R. D’Lugo, of Wicker Smith O’Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A.,
Orlando, for Appellant.

Andrew A. Steadman, of Weisser Elazar & Kantor, PLLC, Fort
Lauderdale, for Appellee.

                        April 28, 2026

PER CURIAM.

    AFFIRMED.

JAY, C.J., and LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
          _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
           _____________________________




                       2