Fodor v. Gonda
Docket 2D2025-2655
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2025-2655
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County
Summary
The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court's decision in a civil dispute between appellant Katalin Fodor and appellee Krisztian Gonda. The appeal was taken to the district court from the Pinellas County Circuit Court, and the appellate panel, writing per curiam, concluded that the lower court's ruling should stand. No extended opinion, reasoning, or factual discussion was provided in the published disposition beyond the court's one-line affirmance and concurrence by the three judges.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's ruling in the underlying civil matter should be reversed on appeal
Court's Reasoning
The district court issued a per curiam affirmance without publishing detailed reasons, indicating it found no reversible error in the circuit court's decision. Because the opinion contains no elaboration, the court relied on the record and standard appellate review to conclude the lower court's judgment should stand.
Parties
- Appellant
- Katalin Fodor
- Appellee
- Krisztian Gonda
- Judge
- Steve D. Berlin
- Attorney
- Scott T. Orsini
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-29
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider motion for rehearing or certification
If the appellant believes the court overlooked a point of law or fact, she may file a motion for rehearing or for certification to the Florida Supreme Court within the time limits set by the appellate rules.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel
Because the appellant proceeded pro se, she should consult an attorney to evaluate grounds for further review and to ensure any required filings meet procedural deadlines.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The appeals court affirmed the circuit court's decision, meaning it found no reversible error and left the lower-court ruling in place.
- Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?
- No; the court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without publishing detailed reasoning in this disposition.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The immediate parties, appellant Katalin Fodor and appellee Krisztian Gonda, are bound by the affirmed judgment unless further relief is sought.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- A party may seek discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court, but such review is not automatic and is subject to the Supreme Court's jurisdiction and acceptance criteria.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
KATALIN FODOR,
Appellant,
v.
KRISZTIAN GONDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-2655
April 29, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Steve D. Berlin,
Judge.
Katalin Fodor, pro se.
Scott T. Orsini of The Orsini Law Group, LLC, St. Petersburg, for
Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KHOUZAM, ATKINSON, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.