G.T. Construction and Development, Inc. v. Century Tile and Marble, Inc.
Docket 4D2025-0849
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 4D2025-0849
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County (case L.T. No. 062022CA004597AXXXCE).
Summary
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment in a dispute between G.T. Construction and Development, Inc. (appellant) and Century Tile and Marble, Inc. (appellee). The panel issued a per curiam opinion, with Judges Levine, Conner, and Shepherd concurring, and noted the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved. No substantive reasoning, facts, or legal analysis appears in the published entry beyond the affirmance.
Parties
- Appellant
- G.T. Construction and Development, Inc.
- Appellee
- Century Tile and Marble, Inc.
- Judge
- Jack Tuter, Jr.
- Attorney
- John Joseph Shahady
- Attorney
- Jason Brent Gonzalez
- Attorney
- Samuel Joseph Salario, Jr.
- Attorney
- Jessica Leighann Slatten
- Attorney
- Raymond Lee Cordova
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-23
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider motion for rehearing
The appellant should decide whether to file a timely motion for rehearing in the district court to challenge the affirmance or preserve issues for further review.
- 2
Evaluate seeking further review
If rehearing is denied or not filed, the appellant may consult counsel about filing a petition for discretionary review with the Florida Supreme Court within the rules' deadlines.
- 3
Comply with mandate if no further review
If no rehearing or higher review is pursued or the appeals process concludes, the parties should prepare to comply with the trial court's judgment and any enforcement steps.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling in favor of the appellee; the brief opinion contains no further explanation.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The parties to the appeal, G.T. Construction and Development, Inc. (appellant) and Century Tile and Marble, Inc. (appellee), are directly affected.
- Is the decision final?
- Not yet — the opinion notes it is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.
- Can this be appealed further?
- Potential further review may be available by seeking rehearing in the district court or discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court, subject to applicable rules and timelines.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
G.T. CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
CENTURY TILE AND MARBLE, INC.,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-0849
[April 23, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Jack Tuter, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No.
062022CA004597AXXXCE.
John Joseph Shahady of Shahady & Wurtenberger, P.A., Fort
Lauderdale, for appellant.
Jason Brent Gonzalez, Samuel Joseph Salario, Jr., Jessica Leighann
Slatten, and Raymond Lee Cordova of Lawson Huck Gonzalez, PLLC,
Tallahassee, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LEVINE, CONNER and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.