George Lambro v. Eduardo Lautieri and Christine Mione Ramos
Docket 4D2025-3740
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 4D2025-3740
Appeal from a nonfinal order of the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
Summary
The District Court of Appeal for Florida's Fourth District affirmed a nonfinal county court order in an appeal filed by George Lambro in a case against Eduardo Lautieri. The opinion is short: the panel issued a per curiam affirmance without published reasoning. The decision was entered on April 30, 2026, and the judgment is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved. Lambro appeared pro se; appellee was represented by counsel.
Issue Decided
- Whether the county court's nonfinal order should be reversed on appeal
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a per curiam affirmance without publishing its reasoning in this brief opinion. By affirming, the panel indicated it found no reversible error in the county court's nonfinal order. The opinion contains no discussion of legal standards or facts.
Parties
- Appellant
- George Lambro
- Appellee
- Eduardo Lautieri
- Attorney
- Thomas J. Ali (for appellee)
- Judge
- Debra Ann Moses Stephens (county court)
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-30
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes there are grounds, they may file a timely motion for rehearing in the district court before the decision becomes final.
- 2
Consult an attorney
The appellant should consult counsel to evaluate the merits of a rehearing motion or potential further appeals and to ensure compliance with appellate deadlines.
- 3
Monitor for finalization
If no rehearing motion is filed or if it is denied, the appellant should track the court's entry of final disposition and any resulting instructions for further proceedings in the county court.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The appeals court affirmed the county court's nonfinal order, meaning it found no reversible error in that order.
- Does this end the case?
- Not necessarily; the opinion notes the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved, so further proceedings or motions are possible.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The immediate parties, appellant George Lambro and appellee Eduardo Lautieri, are affected because the county court's order was affirmed on appeal.
- Can this be appealed further?
- A timely motion for rehearing can be filed in the district court; depending on outcomes and case posture, further appellate review to the Florida Supreme Court might be possible in limited circumstances.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
GEORGE LAMBRO,
Appellant,
v.
EDUARDO LAUTIERI,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-3740
[April 30, 2026]
Appeal of a nonfinal order from the County Court for the Fifteenth
Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Debra Ann Moses Stephens, Judge;
L.T. Case No. 502025CC008885XXXANB.
George Lambro, West Palm Beach, pro se.
Thomas J. Ali of The Law Offices of Thomas J. Ali, P.A., Palm Beach
Gardens, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.