What did the court decide?

The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's decision and dismissed the appeal without providing a detailed written opinion.

Who is affected by this decision?

The immediate parties — appellant Norman Chris Hrabovsky and appellees Trask Daigneault, LLP, Thomas J. Trask, and Jay Daigneault — are affected because the lower-court ruling against which the appeal was taken remains in force.

What does this mean for the appellant?

The appellant's challenge to the circuit court's order was unsuccessful; the judgment or order being appealed stands as affirmed by the Second District.

Can this decision be appealed further?

Potential further review could be sought from the Florida Supreme Court, but seeking discretionary review there requires timely filing of a jurisdictional brief and satisfying the high court's criteria for review.

Hrabovsky v. Trask Daigneault, LLP, Trask

Docket 2D2025-1898

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed

Filed: Apr 17, 2026 · 2 weeks ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 2D2025-1898

Appeal from a circuit court decision in Pinellas County under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130.

Summary

The appellate court reviewed a pro se appeal by Norman Chris Hrabovsky from an order of the Pinellas County Circuit Court involving Trask Daigneault, LLP and two individual defendants. After considering the parties' submissions, the Second District affirmed the lower court's decision. The per curiam opinion provides no extended factual or legal analysis in the published entry, simply announcing the affirmance and noting concurrence by the three judges. No further explanation of the circuit court's reasoning or the issues decided is included in the short published entry.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court's order (as appealed by the pro se appellant) was erroneous — (specific issues not stated in the short opinion).

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is a brief per curiam disposition that affirms the lower court's decision without extended explanation. Because the published entry contains no substantive discussion, the court's operative legal reasoning and the specific factual application are not provided in the text. The affirmation indicates the appellate panel found no reversible error in the circuit court's ruling.

Parties

Appellant: Norman Chris Hrabovsky
Appellee: Trask Daigneault, LLP
Appellee: Thomas J. Trask
Appellee: Jay Daigneault
Judge: Michael F. Andrews
Attorney: Elliott P. Haney
Attorney: Ethan J. Loeb
Attorney: E. Colin Thompson

Key Dates

Court decision: 2026-04-17

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel
If the appellant wishes to pursue further review, consult an attorney experienced in Florida appellate practice to evaluate prospects for discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court and to prepare any required filings.
2
Check deadlines for further review
Identify and calendar the deadline for a jurisdictional or discretionary review petition to the Florida Supreme Court, if any, because such deadlines are short and strict.
3
Review lower-court mandate and compliance
Confirm issuance of the appellate mandate and, if the lower-court order requires action or payment, take steps to comply or seek appropriate post-judgment relief in the circuit court.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's decision and dismissed the appeal without providing a detailed written opinion.
Who is affected by this decision?: The immediate parties — appellant Norman Chris Hrabovsky and appellees Trask Daigneault, LLP, Thomas J. Trask, and Jay Daigneault — are affected because the lower-court ruling against which the appeal was taken remains in force.
What does this mean for the appellant?: The appellant's challenge to the circuit court's order was unsuccessful; the judgment or order being appealed stands as affirmed by the Second District.
Can this decision be appealed further?: Potential further review could be sought from the Florida Supreme Court, but seeking discretionary review there requires timely filing of a jurisdictional brief and satisfying the high court's criteria for review.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                        SECOND DISTRICT


                      NORMAN CHRIS HRABOVSKY,

                                 Appellant,

                                      v.

             TRASK DIAGNEAULT, LLP; THOMAS J. TRASK;
                      AND JAY DAIGNEAULT,

                                 Appellees.


                             No. 2D2025-1898



                               April 17, 2026

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for
Pinellas County; Michael F. Andrews, Judge.

Norman Chris Hrabovsky, pro se.

Elliott P. Haney, Ethan J. Loeb, and E. Colin Thompson of Bartlett Loeb
Hinds Thompson & Angelos, Tampa, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

      Affirmed.

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.