What did the appeals court decide?

The court affirmed the lower court's decision, meaning it upheld that court's ruling.

Who is affected by this decision?

The primary parties affected are appellant Kazi Ahmed and appellee Krzysztof Duszka, the parties to the underlying Monroe County civil case.

Can this decision change?

Yes. The opinion notes it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing, so a rehearing motion could alter the outcome.

Kazi Ahmed v. Krzysztof Duszka

Docket 3D2025-1260

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed

Filed: Apr 29, 2026 · 2 days ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 3D2025-1260

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County (case No. 22-CA-846-K).

Summary

The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in a civil case between appellant Kazi Ahmed and appellee Krzysztof Duszka. The appeal arose from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, and both parties appeared pro se. The per curiam opinion is brief and simply states the appeal is affirmed without published reasoning in the opinion. The ruling is subject to possible change if a timely motion for rehearing is filed.

Parties

Appellant: Kazi Ahmed
Appellee: Krzysztof Duszka
Judge: James M. Barton, II

Key Dates

Opinion filed: 2026-04-29

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If a party wishes to challenge the appellate ruling further, they should file a timely motion for rehearing in the Third District according to the court's rules.
2
Consult counsel for options
Because both parties proceeded pro se below and on appeal, they should consult an attorney to evaluate further appellate options, including a rehearing or seeking discretionary review.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The court affirmed the lower court's decision, meaning it upheld that court's ruling.
Who is affected by this decision?: The primary parties affected are appellant Kazi Ahmed and appellee Krzysztof Duszka, the parties to the underlying Monroe County civil case.
Can this decision change?: Yes. The opinion notes it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing, so a rehearing motion could alter the outcome.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

Third District Court of Appeal
                               State of Florida

                         Opinion filed April 29, 2026.
       Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                            ________________

                             No. 3D25-1260
                     Lower Tribunal No. 22-CA-846-K
                          ________________


                               Kazi Ahmed,
                                  Appellant,

                                     vs.

                           Krzysztof Duszka,
                                  Appellee.


       An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, James M. Barton,
II, Judge.

     Kazi Ahmed, in proper person.

     Krzysztof Duszka, in proper person.


Before LOGUE, GORDO, and BOKOR, JJ.

     PER CURIAM.

     Affirmed.