What did the appeals court decide?

The appeals court affirmed the lower court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error in the circuit court's decision.

Does this change the trial court's order?

No. An affirmance leaves the trial court's order in place and enforceable.

Who is affected by this decision?

The parties to the case—Appellant David Laurine and the listed appellees, including Victoria A. Shupe and others—are directly affected because the trial court's outcome is upheld.

Can this decision be appealed further?

Possible further review could be sought from the Florida Supreme Court, but the court must typically accept discretionary review or meet jurisdictional criteria.

Laurine v. Shupe

Docket 2D2025-0909

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed

Filed: Apr 24, 2026 · 1 week ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 2D2025-0909

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County (trial court decision reviewed by the district court).

Summary

The Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision in a dispute involving David Laurine and several family-related appellees, including Victoria A. Shupe in various capacities. The appeal from the Pinellas County circuit court was heard on the record and the panel issued a per curiam opinion, affirming the lower court's ruling without published opinion. The court provided no extended reasoning in this short entry and the judgment of the circuit court therefore stands as affirmed.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court's judgment adverse to Appellant David Laurine should be reversed.

Court's Reasoning

The per curiam entry affirms the trial court's judgment. The opinion contains no extended discussion of legal principles or factual analysis, indicating the appellate panel found no reversible error in the circuit court's proceedings or conclusions. Because the court issued a short per curiam affirmance, the underlying trial-court reasoning and factual determinations remain intact.

Parties

Appellant: David Laurine
Appellee: Victoria A. Shupe, individually, as Trustee of the Laurine Revocable Trust dated November 14, 2011
Appellee: Victoria A. Shupe, as the parent and natural guardian for N.S.S., a minor
Appellee: Jackson R. Shupe
Appellee: Vivian Laurine
Judge: Sherwood S. Coleman
Attorney: Ryan G. Nagle (for Appellant)
Attorney: John A. Schifino (for Appellees)

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-24

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel
If any party is considering further review, they should consult appellate counsel promptly to evaluate grounds for discretionary review and filing deadlines.
2
Enforce or comply with judgment
Parties should take steps to enforce or comply with the circuit court's order now that it has been affirmed, including any execution or administrative actions required.
3
Consider motion for rehearing
If grounds exist, a timely motion for rehearing or clarification at the district court may be filed per court rules; consult counsel for timing and content.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The appeals court affirmed the lower court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error in the circuit court's decision.
Does this change the trial court's order?: No. An affirmance leaves the trial court's order in place and enforceable.
Who is affected by this decision?: The parties to the case—Appellant David Laurine and the listed appellees, including Victoria A. Shupe and others—are directly affected because the trial court's outcome is upheld.
Can this decision be appealed further?: Possible further review could be sought from the Florida Supreme Court, but the court must typically accept discretionary review or meet jurisdictional criteria.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                          SECOND DISTRICT



                              DAVID LAURINE,

                                 Appellant,

                                      v.

                      VICTORIA A. SHUPE, individually,
                as Trustee of the Laurine Revocable Trust dated
                   November 14, 2011; VICTORIA A. SHUPE,
            as the parent and natural guardian for N.S.S, a minor;
                  JACKSON R. SHUPE; and VIVIAN LAURINE,

                                  Appellees.


                              No. 2D2025-0909



                               April 24, 2026

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Sherwood S. Coleman,
Judge.

Ryan G. Nagle of Adrian Philip Thomas, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for
Appellant.

John A. Schifino of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., Tampa, for
Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LUCAS, C.J., and LaROSE and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.




                                      2