What did the court decide?

The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's nonfinal orders in favor of the appellee; the decision is brief and does not explain detailed reasoning.

Who is affected by this decision?

The parties to the appeal, LP Glass Technologies, Inc. (appellant) and Barron Development Corporation (appellee), are directly affected; the circuit court's nonfinal orders remain in place unless successfully reheard or further appealed.

Can this decision be challenged further?

A timely motion for rehearing to the district court can be filed; if rehearing is denied, further review to the Florida Supreme Court may be sought if appropriate.

What happens next procedurally?

The decision is not final until any timely-filed motion for rehearing is resolved, after which parties may pursue additional appellate review if permitted.

LP Glass Technologies, Inc. v. Barron Development Corporation

Docket 4D2025-3537

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed

Filed: Apr 30, 2026 · yesterday
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 4D2025-3537

Consolidated appeal of nonfinal orders from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County.

Summary

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court's nonfinal orders in a consolidated appeal brought by LP Glass Technologies, Inc. against Barron Development Corporation. The appellate panel, in a brief per curiam decision, concluded that the lower court's rulings should stand and did not provide extended reasoning in the published entry. The opinion affirms the challenged orders and notes the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court's nonfinal orders in the underlying civil action were properly entered.

Court's Reasoning

The per curiam opinion affirms the lower court's nonfinal orders but does not elaborate on the court's legal analysis or factual findings in this short entry. The appellate panel found no reversible error in the rulings presented for review. Because the opinion is terse, specific legal rules or fact-application details are not provided in the published disposition.

Parties

Appellant: LP Glass Technologies, Inc.
Appellee: Barron Development Corporation
Attorney: Hae Jung Kim
Attorney: Kieran F. O'Connor
Attorney: Morgan Lyle Weinstein
Judge: Keathan Briscoe Frink
Judge: Nickolaus Hunter Davis

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-30

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes there are grounds, they should file a timely motion for rehearing in the Fourth District to ask the court to reconsider before the decision becomes final.
2
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If rehearing is denied, discuss with counsel whether seeking discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court is warranted based on preserved issues and jurisdictional criteria.
3
Proceed in the circuit court as appropriate
Because the orders affirmed were nonfinal, parties should coordinate with trial counsel to comply with or respond to those orders and prepare for further proceedings in the circuit court.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's nonfinal orders in favor of the appellee; the decision is brief and does not explain detailed reasoning.
Who is affected by this decision?: The parties to the appeal, LP Glass Technologies, Inc. (appellant) and Barron Development Corporation (appellee), are directly affected; the circuit court's nonfinal orders remain in place unless successfully reheard or further appealed.
Can this decision be challenged further?: A timely motion for rehearing to the district court can be filed; if rehearing is denied, further review to the Florida Supreme Court may be sought if appropriate.
What happens next procedurally?: The decision is not final until any timely-filed motion for rehearing is resolved, after which parties may pursue additional appellate review if permitted.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                               FOURTH DISTRICT

                   LP GLASS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
                             Appellant,

                                      v.

               BARRON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
                           Appellee.

                 Nos. 4D2025-2951 and 4D2025-3537

                               [April 30, 2026]

   Consolidated appeal of a nonfinal orders from the Circuit Court for the
Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Keathan Briscoe Frink and
Nickolaus     Hunter      Davis,      Judges;     L.T.     Case      Nos.
062025CA000776AXXXCE and 062025CA001241AXXXCE.

  Hae Jung Kim and Kieran F. O’Connor of O’Connor & Stolinas Law
Group, PLLC, Orlando, for appellant.

  Morgan Lyle Weinstein of Twig, Trade, & Tribunal, PLLC, Fort
Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

                           *          *           *

   Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.