Luiz Silva v. Frances Von Holten, Joseph Von Holten, Vinicius Lara, and Vizzion Construction, LLC
Docket 5D2026-0168
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 5D2026-0168
Appeal from a decision of the County Court for Brevard County
Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower-court judgment in a case brought by appellant Luiz Silva against Frances Von Holten, Joseph Von Holten, Vinicius Lara, and Vizzion Construction, LLC. The appeal was decided by a three-judge panel and the court issued a brief per curiam affirmance citing Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). No appellee brief or appearance was filed. The decision is final subject to any timely motion authorized by the appellate rules for rehearing or clarification.
Issue Decided
- Whether the county court's judgment should be reversed on appeal
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a per curiam affirmance and cited Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), which authorizes summary affirmance when the appeal presents no reversible error or the grounds are apparent. The brief disposition indicates the appellate panel found no basis to disturb the county court's decision. No additional factual or legal discussion was provided in the opinion.
Authorities Cited
- Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a)Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a)
Parties
- Appellant
- Luiz Silva
- Appellee
- Frances Von Holten
- Appellee
- Joseph Von Holten
- Appellee
- Vinicius Lara
- Appellee
- Vizzion Construction, LLC.
- Judge
- David E. Silverman
- Judge
- MAKAR, J.
- Judge
- EISNAUGLE, J.
- Judge
- KILBANE, J.
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-16
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing or clarification
If the appellant believes there is a basis, they should file a timely motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 alleging specific grounds for reconsideration.
- 2
Consult an attorney about further review
If further appellate review (such as a petition for review to the Florida Supreme Court) is possible, consult counsel promptly to evaluate jurisdictional grounds and deadlines.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The appeals court affirmed the county court's judgment and declined to reverse it.
- Why was the case affirmed?
- The court issued a short per curiam affirmance under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), indicating it found no reversible error warranting reversal.
- Can this decision be challenged further?
- A party may file timely motions authorized by the appellate rules (for rehearing or clarification) and, where applicable, seek further review if permitted by higher courts.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2026-0168
L.T. Case No. 05-2023-SC-026903
_____________________________
LUIZ SILVA,
Appellant,
v.
FRANCES VON HOLTEN, JOSEPH
VON HOLTEN, VINICIUS LARA,
and VIZZION CONSTRUCTION,
LLC.,
Appellees.
_____________________________
On appeal from the County Court for Brevard County.
David E. Silverman, Judge.
Luiz Silva, Orlando, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellees.
April 16, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).
MAKAR, EISNAUGLE, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
2