Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Mark David Kaufman v. Franserly Coromoto Garcia

Docket 4D2024-2803

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Case type
Civil
Disposition
Affirmed
Docket
4D2024-2803

Appeal from a final judgment of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County (case no. 062016DR013212AXXXCE).

Summary

The Fourth District Court of Appeal reviewed an appeal by Mark David Kaufman from a final decision of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County involving Case No. 062016DR013212AXXXCE. Both parties appeared pro se. The appellate court, in a per curiam opinion, affirmed the lower court's judgment. The opinion is brief and provides no extended reasoning in the published entry; it notes concurrence by all three judges and that the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the circuit court's judgment in case no. 062016DR013212AXXXCE should be reversed on appeal.

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a per curiam opinion affirming the lower court's judgment. The published entry gives no separate written analysis or discussion of legal principles; the unanimous panel concurred in the affirmance. The entry also indicates the decision is subject to change if a timely motion for rehearing is filed and resolved.

Parties

Appellant
Mark David Kaufman
Appellee
Franserly Coromoto Garcia
Judge
Lauren M. Alperstein

Key Dates

Appellate decision date
2026-04-30

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consider filing a motion for rehearing

    If a party believes the court overlooked controlling law or made a clear error, they may file a timely motion for rehearing in the district court before the decision becomes final.

  2. 2

    Consult an attorney about further review

    After any rehearing is resolved, consult counsel to determine if there are grounds to seek further review by the Florida Supreme Court and to prepare a petition if appropriate.

  3. 3

    Prepare to comply with the lower-court judgment

    If no rehearing is filed or rehearing is denied, the parties should take steps to comply with the circuit court's judgment and any resulting obligations or deadlines.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?
The appeals court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, meaning it upheld the lower court's decision.
Who is affected by this decision?
The parties to the case—appellant Mark David Kaufman and appellee Franserly Coromoto Garcia—are directly affected, as the appeal failed to change the lower-court result.
Is this decision final?
Not yet final: the opinion notes the decision is not final until disposition of any timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Can this be appealed further?
After resolution of any rehearing motion, the parties may seek further review (for example, a petition for discretionary review to the Florida Supreme Court) if statutory grounds for such review exist.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FOURTH DISTRICT

                       MARK DAVID KAUFMAN,
                             Appellant,

                                     v.

                  FRANSERLY COROMOTO GARCIA,
                            Appellee.

                           No. 4D2024-2803

                              [April 30, 2026]

   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Lauren M. Alperstein, Judge; L.T. Case No.
062016DR013212AXXXCE.

   Mark David Kaufman, Plantation, pro se.

   Franserly Coromoto Garcia, Boca Raton, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

   Affirmed.

KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

                          *          *           *

   Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.