Marylou Elaine Muscillo v. Gilles P. Cournoyer
Docket 3D2025-0561
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 3D2025-0561
Appeal from a final judgment in a civil action in the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County
Summary
The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment in a civil dispute between appellant Marylou Elaine Muscillo and appellee Gilles P. Cournoyer. The opinion, issued April 22, 2026, is per curiam and brief, stating only the disposition without published reasoning. The appellate court declined to reverse or remand the lower court's decision, leaving the trial court's ruling in place subject to any timely rehearing motion. No further factual or legal explanation appears in the opinion.
Issue Decided
- Whether the trial court's judgment should be reversed or otherwise disturbed on appeal
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is per curiam and contains no written explanation; the court affirmed the lower tribunal's judgment. Because the court provided no reasoning in the published opinion, the specific legal rules and factual findings that supported the affirmation are not stated.
Parties
- Appellant
- Marylou Elaine Muscillo
- Appellee
- Gilles P. Cournoyer
- Judge
- Lourdes Simon
- Attorney
- Joan Carlos Wizel
- Attorney
- Hinda Klein
Key Dates
- Opinion filed
- 2026-04-22
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes there are grounds, she may file a timely motion for rehearing in the Third District to request reconsideration of the panel's decision.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If rehearing is denied, consult counsel to evaluate whether to seek discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court and to assess preservation of issues and deadlines.
- 3
Comply with the trial court's judgment
Unless stayed, parties should prepare to comply with or enforce the underlying trial-court judgment that the appellate court affirmed.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appeals court affirmed the trial court's judgment, meaning it rejected the appellant's challenge and left the lower-court decision in place.
- Does the opinion explain why the court ruled that way?
- No. The opinion is per curiam and contains only the single-word disposition 'Affirmed' without written reasons.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The parties to the case—appellant Marylou Elaine Muscillo and appellee Gilles P. Cournoyer—are directly affected because the appellate court upheld the trial court's ruling.
- What happens next?
- A party may file a timely motion for rehearing in the Third District; if rehearing is denied, the next step could be seeking discretionary review from the Florida Supreme Court.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed April 22, 2026.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D25-0561
Lower Tribunal No. 20-18167-CA-01
Marylou Elaine Muscillo,
Appellant,
vs.
Gilles P. Cournoyer,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lourdes
Simon, Judge.
Llopiz Wizel LLP and Joan Carlos Wizel (Fort Lauderdale), for
appellant.
Conroy Simberg and Hinda Klein (Hollywood), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.