What did the appeals court decide?

The appeals court affirmed the trial court's judgment, meaning the appellate panel found no reversible error in the lower court's decision based on this entry.

Who is affected by this decision?

The parties to the case—My Harrison Corp. (the appellant) and Home Tower Condominium, Inc. (the appellee)—are directly affected; the trial-court outcome stands unless a successful rehearing or further appeal is pursued.

Does this decision explain why the court ruled this way?

No. The per curiam entry does not include the court's substantive reasoning or legal analysis.

Can this decision be further appealed?

Possibly. The entry notes it is not final until disposition of any timely-filed motion for rehearing; after that, a party may seek further review by higher court if allowable under Florida appellate rules.

My Harrison Corp. v. Home Tower Condominium, Inc.

Docket 4D2025-1144

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed

Filed: Apr 23, 2026 · 1 week ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 4D2025-1144

Appeal from a circuit court judgment in a civil action (Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, L.T. Case No. 062024CA016458AXXXCE).

Summary

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower-court judgment in a dispute between My Harrison Corp. (appellant) and Home Tower Condominium, Inc. (appellee). The appeal arose from a Broward County Circuit Court case (No. 062024CA016458AXXXCE). The appellate panel issued a per curiam opinion, with Judges Levine, Conner, and Shepherd concurring, and entered judgment affirming the trial court. The opinion is short and does not state the underlying factual or legal reasoning in the published entry.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court's judgment should be reversed on appeal

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a per curiam disposition affirming the lower court. The short entry does not provide the court's detailed legal reasoning or analyze applicable law; it simply records that the panel unanimously affirmed the judgment. Because no opinion content is provided, the operative rationale is not stated in this document.

Parties

Appellant: My Harrison Corp.
Appellee: Home Tower Condominium, Inc.
Judge: Michele Towbin Singer
Attorney: George Lambert
Attorney: Edward Francis Holodak

Key Dates

Appellate decision date: 2026-04-23

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
A party dissatisfied with the outcome should determine if a timely motion for rehearing is warranted and permitted under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure; the opinion notes the judgment is not final until any timely rehearing is resolved.
2
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If rehearing is denied or not pursued, consult counsel promptly to evaluate whether to seek discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court and to assess the deadlines and merits for such review.
3
Comply with the trial-court judgment
If no further appellate relief is sought or available, comply with the trial-court judgment and any mandated actions or deadlines arising from the underlying circuit-court case.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The appeals court affirmed the trial court's judgment, meaning the appellate panel found no reversible error in the lower court's decision based on this entry.
Who is affected by this decision?: The parties to the case—My Harrison Corp. (the appellant) and Home Tower Condominium, Inc. (the appellee)—are directly affected; the trial-court outcome stands unless a successful rehearing or further appeal is pursued.
Does this decision explain why the court ruled this way?: No. The per curiam entry does not include the court's substantive reasoning or legal analysis.
Can this decision be further appealed?: Possibly. The entry notes it is not final until disposition of any timely-filed motion for rehearing; after that, a party may seek further review by higher court if allowable under Florida appellate rules.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FOURTH DISTRICT

                       MY HARRISON CORP.,
                            Appellant,

                                     v.

                HOME TOWER CONDOMINIUM, INC.,
                          Appellee.

                          No. 4D2025-1144

                              [April 23, 2026]

   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Michele Towbin Singer, Judge; L.T. Case No.
062024CA016458AXXXCE.

    George Lambert of The Lambert Law Firm Professional Corp., Sunny
Isles Beach, for appellant.

    Edward Francis Holodak of Edward F. Holodak, P.A., Fort Lauderdale,
for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

  Affirmed.

LEVINE, CONNER and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.

                          *          *           *

  Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.