Nova Palms Holdings LLC v. Moosa Syhead
Docket 4D2025-0120
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 4D2025-0120
Appeal from a final judgment entered by the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County (case no. 062022CA009666AXXXCE).
Summary
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment in favor of appellee Moosa Syhead against appellant Nova Palms Holdings LLC. The appeal arose from a Broward County circuit court case (062022CA009666AXXXCE). The appellate panel issued a brief per curiam decision, stating simply 'Affirmed' without elaboration. Because the opinion offers no substantive explanation, the appellate court left intact the lower court's ruling and allowed any timely motion for rehearing to proceed under normal rules.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's judgment in favor of Moosa Syhead should be reversed on appeal.
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is per curiam and contains no substantive explanation; the court affirmed the lower court's judgment. Because the decision provides no discussion of legal standards or fact application, the appellate disposition treats the trial court's ruling as correct without publishing the reasoning in this opinion.
Parties
- Appellant
- Nova Palms Holdings LLC
- Appellee
- Moosa Syhead
- Judge
- William W. Haury, Jr.
- Attorney
- Andre G. Raikhelson
- Attorney
- David Brian Pakula
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-16
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
A timely motion for rehearing in the district court may be filed if appellant believes an error of law or fact warrants reconsideration; note the opinion states it is not final until disposition of any timely rehearing motion.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If rehearing is denied, consult counsel promptly to evaluate whether discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court is available and advisable.
- 3
Comply with the underlying judgment
Unless a successful post-decision filing stays enforcement, the parties should comply with the trial court's judgment affirmed on appeal.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The appeals court affirmed the trial court's judgment in favor of Moosa Syhead, meaning the lower court's decision stands.
- Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?
- No. The opinion is a short per curiam affirmance and does not include the court's reasoning.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The parties to the case—Nova Palms Holdings LLC (the appellant) and Moosa Syhead (the appellee)—are directly affected because the trial court's ruling remains in effect.
- Can this decision be challenged further?
- Potentially, the appellant may seek rehearing in the district court or, in some cases, discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court if the case meets jurisdictional criteria.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
NOVA PALMS HOLDINGS LLC,
Appellant,
v.
MOOSA SYHEAD,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-0120
[April 16, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; William W. Haury, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No.
062022CA009666AXXXCE.
Andre G. Raikhelson of Law Offices of Andre G. Raikhelson, LLC, Boca
Raton, for appellant.
David Brian Pakula of David B. Pakula, P.A., Pembroke Pines, for
appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LEVINE, FORST and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.