Perdomo v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society
Docket 2D2025-2386
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2025-2386
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County
Summary
The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in a case where Irma Cristal Perdomo appealed a judgment involving Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as trustee. The appeal was taken from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County and was decided without published opinion beyond the single-word disposition. The panel issued a per curiam order affirming the circuit court's judgment with three judges concurring. No extended reasoning or detailed facts were provided in the appellate entry.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's judgment in favor of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB should be reversed by the appellate court
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is a per curiam affirmance and contains no substantive explanation of the legal analysis; the appellate panel summarily concluded that affirmance was appropriate. Because the entry provides only the disposition and concurrence, the court did not set out the operative legal rule or factual application in this document.
Parties
- Appellant
- Irma Cristal Perdomo
- Appellee
- Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as trustee of Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust F
- Judge
- Christopher C. Nash
- Attorney
- Eric M. Levine
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-05-01
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult an attorney about further review
If you wish to challenge the affirmance, consult counsel promptly to determine eligibility for discretionary review petitions and to meet filing deadlines.
- 2
Obtain and review the circuit court record
Request the lower court docket and orders to understand the underlying judgment and any remaining obligations or enforcement steps.
- 3
Comply with the judgment
If the affirmed judgment imposes obligations or deadlines, take steps to comply or to address enforcement to avoid adverse consequences.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's judgment in favor of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The parties to the appeal—Appellant Irma Cristal Perdomo and Appellee Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB—are directly affected; the lower-court judgment remains in place.
- Does the opinion explain why the court ruled this way?
- No. The entry is a brief per curiam affirmance and does not include the court's reasoning or legal analysis.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- A party may seek further review (for example, by the Florida Supreme Court) only if permitted under the rules for discretionary review; time limits and jurisdictional requirements apply.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
IRMA CRISTAL PERDOMO,
Appellant,
v.
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB,
as trustee of Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust F,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-2386
May 1, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher C.
Nash, Judge.
Irma Cristal Perdomo, pro se.
Eric M. Levine of Atlas | Solomon, LLP, Stuart, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and GUARD, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.