What did the appeals court decide?

The appeals court affirmed the trial court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error in the lower court's decision.

Who is affected by this decision?

The parties to the appeal—Appellant Joan Randazzo and Appellees Walgreen Co., 8951 Hudson LLC, and Dynaserv Florida, LLC—are directly affected, as the outcome of the trial court remains in place.

Does this ruling explain the court's legal reasoning?

No; this entry is a brief per curiam affirmance without a published opinion providing detailed legal analysis.

Can this decision be appealed further?

A party may seek discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court, but such review is not automatic and must meet that court's jurisdictional standards.

Randazzo v. Walgreen Co., Walgreens

Docket 2D2024-2882

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed

Filed: Apr 24, 2026 · 1 week ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 2D2024-2882

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County (trial court decision reviewed by the District Court of Appeal, Second District)

Summary

The Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment in a premises-liability or related negligence appeal brought by Joan Randazzo against Walgreens, 8951 Hudson LLC, and Dynaserv Florida, LLC. The appellate panel issued a brief per curiam decision concluding the lower court's ruling was correct and required no change. The court did not publish a full opinion here; the judgment below therefore stands as reviewed and affirmed without published reasoning in this entry.

Issue Decided

Whether the trial court's judgment for the defendants was incorrect and should be reversed.

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a short per curiam ruling affirming the lower court's decision. No extended opinion or detailed legal analysis appears in this entry, so the appellate court must have concluded that the trial court's judgment was legally sound or that no reversible error was shown on appeal.

Parties

Appellant: Joan Randazzo
Appellee: Walgreen Co. (d/b/a Walgreens)
Appellee: 8951 Hudson LLC
Appellee: Dynaserv Florida, LLC
Judge: Declan Mansfield
Attorney: Brian L. Elstein
Attorney: Thomas A. Valdez
Attorney: Daniel S. Weinger
Attorney: Andres Baltodano

Key Dates

Court of Appeal decision: 2026-04-24

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If a party wishes to pursue further review, they should promptly consult appellate counsel about seeking discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court and applicable filing deadlines.
2
Implement or enforce trial-court judgment
The prevailing party should take steps to enforce the trial-court judgment or obtain any required writs or orders to collect relief awarded by the trial court.
3
Confirm any outstanding procedural deadlines
Parties should verify remaining deadlines for motions for rehearing, rehearing en banc, or petitions for review and act promptly if they intend to file them.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The appeals court affirmed the trial court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error in the lower court's decision.
Who is affected by this decision?: The parties to the appeal—Appellant Joan Randazzo and Appellees Walgreen Co., 8951 Hudson LLC, and Dynaserv Florida, LLC—are directly affected, as the outcome of the trial court remains in place.
Does this ruling explain the court's legal reasoning?: No; this entry is a brief per curiam affirmance without a published opinion providing detailed legal analysis.
Can this decision be appealed further?: A party may seek discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court, but such review is not automatic and must meet that court's jurisdictional standards.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                       SECOND DISTRICT



                           JOAN RANDAZZO,

                                Appellant,

                                    v.

     WALGREEN CO., an Illinois corporation d/b/a WALGREENS;
        8951 HUDSON LLC, an Illinois limited liability company;
   and DYNASERV FLORIDA, LLC, a Florida limited liability company,

                                Appellees.

                            No. 2D2024-2882



                              April 24, 2026

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Declan Mansfield,
Judge.

Brian L. Elstein of Jack Bernstein, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Thomas A. Valdez of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Tampa, for
Appellee Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation d/b/a Walgreens.

Daniel S. Weinger and Andres Baltodano of Luks, Santaniello, Petrillo,
Cohen & Peterfriend, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee Dynaserv Florida,
LLC.

No appearance for Appellee 8951 Hudson LLC, an Illinois limited liability
company.
PER CURIAM.

      Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.


Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.




                                      2