Richard Block v. Midwest One Bank
Docket 4D2025-2121
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 4D2025-2121
Appeal from a circuit court decision in a civil case (Palm Beach County, L.T. Case No. 502024CA008105XXXAMB).
Summary
The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision in a dispute between appellant Richard Block and appellee Midwest One Bank. The appeal, taken from an order in Palm Beach County Circuit Court (case no. 502024CA008105XXXAMB), was argued pro se by Block; Midwest One Bank was represented by counsel. The appellate court issued a short per curiam opinion stating simply: Affirmed. No separate written opinion, legal analysis, or change in the lower court's judgment was provided in the published entry.
Issue Decided
- Whether the appellate court should reverse the circuit court's ruling in the dispute between Richard Block and Midwest One Bank.
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a short per curiam decision affirming the lower court without publishing an explanatory opinion. The entry gives no substantive legal reasoning or facts; the affirmation indicates the panel found no reversible error in the trial court's ruling. Because no grounds or analysis were provided, the affirmation stands as the final disposition unless a timely motion for rehearing is filed.
Parties
- Appellant
- Richard Block
- Appellee
- Midwest One Bank
- Judge
- Reid Parker Scott, II
- Attorney
- Christopher D. Donovan
- Attorney
- Paul Anthony Giordano
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-30
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
A timely motion for rehearing in the district court could ask the panel to reconsider; the opinion notes the decision is not final until disposition of any timely rehearing motion.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel
Because the appellant proceeded pro se, consult an experienced appellate attorney to evaluate grounds for rehearing or further review and to prepare any necessary filings within strict deadlines.
- 3
Evaluate petition to Florida Supreme Court
If rehearing is denied and there are appropriate grounds (conflict with controlling decisions or important state law questions), consider seeking discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision in favor of Midwest One Bank; no written opinion or explanation was provided.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The primary parties affected are appellant Richard Block and appellee Midwest One Bank; the trial court's ruling remains in effect.
- What happens next?
- The judgment remains affirmed unless a timely motion for rehearing is filed; after rehearing deadlines lapse, further appellate review (such as a petition to the Florida Supreme Court) may be considered if applicable.
- Can this be appealed further?
- Potentially, but further review would typically require either a successful rehearing in the district court or seeking discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court, which accepts limited cases.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
RICHARD BLOCK,
Appellant,
v.
MIDWEST ONE BANK,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2121
[April 30, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
Beach County; Reid Parker Scott, II, Judge; L.T. Case No.
502024CA008105XXXAMB.
Richard Block, Delray Beach, pro se.
Christopher D. Donovan of Donovan Appellate Law, PLLC, Estero, and
Paul Anthony Giordano of Roetzel & Andress, Fort Myers, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.