What did the appeals court decide?

The appeals court affirmed the trial court's judgment, meaning it rejected the appellant's request to reverse that judgment.

Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?

No. The opinion is a short per curiam affirmance and does not provide the court's substantive reasoning or analysis.

Can this decision be appealed further?

Yes. The appellant may seek further review, such as a motion for rehearing in the district court or a discretionary review petition to the Florida Supreme Court, subject to procedural deadlines and standards for review.

ROBERT LEE KING, JR. v. MARK S. BROWN, M.D., PREMIER MEN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF ORLANDO, LLC, and OPS INTERNATIONAL, INC. D/B/A OLYMPIA PHARMACEUTICALS

Docket 6D2024-2294

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed

Filed: Apr 28, 2026 · 3 days ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 6D2024-2294

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County (case no. 2023-CA-001961) reviewing a civil judgment.

Summary

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's judgment in a civil case brought by Robert Lee King, Jr. against Mark S. Brown, M.D., Premier Men's Medical Center of Orlando, LLC, and OPS International, Inc. d/b/a Olympia Pharmaceuticals. The appellate court issued a short per curiam opinion, noting only the affirmance without elaboration. The decision means the trial court's ruling stands and the appellant's grounds for reversal were rejected by the appellate panel. No further reasoning or factual findings are provided in the published entry.

Issue Decided

Whether the trial court's judgment should be reversed on the grounds raised by appellant Robert Lee King, Jr.

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is a brief per curiam entry that affirms the lower court's judgment without published explanation. By affirming, the appellate court concluded that the appellant's arguments lacked merit or were insufficient to disturb the trial court's ruling. The court's agreement by all three judges indicates unanimous disposition, but no substantive legal analysis is provided in the opinion.

Parties

Appellant: Robert Lee King, Jr.
Appellee: Mark S. Brown, M.D.
Appellee: Premier Men’s Medical Center of Orlando, LLC
Appellee: OPS International, Inc. d/b/a Olympia Pharmaceuticals
Judge: Margaret H. Schreiber
Judge: Traver, C.J.
Judge: Smith, J.
Judge: Kamoutsas, J.

Key Dates

District court decision date: 2026-04-28

What You Should Do Next

1
Check deadlines for rehearing or further review
If the appellant wishes to continue, they should timely file a motion for rehearing in the district court and consider a petition for discretionary review to the Florida Supreme Court, following applicable deadlines and rules.
2
Consult appellate counsel
Parties should consult their attorneys to evaluate grounds for rehearing or further appeal and to decide whether to pursue additional proceedings or to comply with the affirmed judgment.
3
Comply with trial-court judgment
Unless a stay is obtained, the parties should ensure they comply with any obligations imposed by the trial-court judgment now affirmed on appeal.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The appeals court affirmed the trial court's judgment, meaning it rejected the appellant's request to reverse that judgment.
Who is affected by this decision?: The parties to the case—appellant Robert Lee King, Jr., and appellees Mark S. Brown, Premier Men's Medical Center of Orlando, LLC, and OPS International, Inc.—are directly affected; the trial court's judgment remains in place.
Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?: No. The opinion is a short per curiam affirmance and does not provide the court's substantive reasoning or analysis.
Can this decision be appealed further?: Yes. The appellant may seek further review, such as a motion for rehearing in the district court or a discretionary review petition to the Florida Supreme Court, subject to procedural deadlines and standards for review.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                       STATE OF FLORIDA
                      _____________________________

                           Case No. 6D2024-2294
                     Lower Tribunal No. 2023-CA-001961
                      _____________________________

                            ROBERT LEE KING, JR.,

                                  Appellant,

                                      v.

MARK S. BROWN, M.D., PREMIER MEN’S MEDICAL CENTER OF ORLANDO, LLC, and
         OPS INTERNATIONAL, INC. d/b/a OLYMPIA PHARMACEUTICALS,

                                  Appellees.
                      _____________________________

               Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.
                         Margaret H. Schreiber, Judge.

                                April 28, 2026

PER CURIAM.

      AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and SMITH and KAMOUTSAS, JJ., concur.

Benedict P. Kuehne, Michael T. Davis, and Johan Dos Santos, of Kuehne Davis
Law, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Christian P. Trowbridge and J. Charles Ingram, of Estes, Ingram, Foels & Gibbs,
P.A., Maitland, for Appellees, Mark S. Brown, M.D., and Premier Men’s Medical
Center of Orlando, LLC.

Michael R. D’Lugo, of Wicker Smith O’Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for
Appellee, OPS International, Inc. d/b/a Olympia Pharmaceuticals.

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
          AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED