Serball v. Bouaphanh
Docket 2D2025-2613
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2025-2613
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County
Summary
The district court reviewed an appeal by Louis Serball from a Pasco County circuit court decision. After considering the record, the appellate panel issued a brief per curiam decision affirming the lower court's judgment. No opinion explaining the court's reasoning was published beyond the simple affirmation, and the appellee did not file an appearance in the appeal. The mandate affirms the trial court's ruling, leaving the circuit court's judgment intact.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's judgment should be reversed on the grounds raised by the appellant (issues not specified in the per curiam opinion)
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a concise per curiam affirmance without publishing detailed reasoning. By affirming, the panel concluded that the appellant's arguments did not warrant reversal. The lack of an appellee appearance and absence of a published opinion means the appellate court found no reversible error apparent on the record presented.
Parties
- Appellant
- Louis Serball
- Appellee
- Vanessa Bouaphanh
- Judge
- Susan G. Barthle
Key Dates
- Opinion date
- 2026-04-22
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing for further review
If there are grounds for discretionary review, the appellant should consult counsel promptly about a petition to the Florida Supreme Court and confirm applicable filing deadlines.
- 2
Request issuance of mandate
If no further appeal will be pursued, the appellant or appellee can request issuance of the appellate mandate to conclude the appeal and allow the trial-court judgment to be enforced or carried out.
- 3
Consult an attorney for enforcement or relief
Parties should consult counsel on next steps in the trial court, such as enforcement of the judgment or pursuing any post-judgment relief now that the appeal is resolved.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appellate court decide?
- The court affirmed the lower court's judgment, leaving the circuit court's decision in place.
- Does this opinion explain why the court affirmed?
- No; the court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without a published explanation of its reasoning.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The parties to the case — appellant Louis Serball and appellee Vanessa Bouaphanh — are directly affected because the trial-court judgment remains final unless further review is sought.
- Can the appellant seek further review?
- Yes. The appellant may consider seeking discretionary review (for example, a petition to the Florida Supreme Court) if statutory criteria for review are met, subject to applicable deadlines.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
LOUIS SERBALL,
Appellant,
v.
VANESSA BOUAPHANH,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-2613
April 22, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Susan G. Barthle,
Judge.
Louis Serball, pro se.
No appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.