Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Serball v. Bouaphanh

Docket 2D2025-2613

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Case type
Civil
Disposition
Affirmed
Docket
2D2025-2613

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County

Summary

The district court reviewed an appeal by Louis Serball from a Pasco County circuit court decision. After considering the record, the appellate panel issued a brief per curiam decision affirming the lower court's judgment. No opinion explaining the court's reasoning was published beyond the simple affirmation, and the appellee did not file an appearance in the appeal. The mandate affirms the trial court's ruling, leaving the circuit court's judgment intact.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the circuit court's judgment should be reversed on the grounds raised by the appellant (issues not specified in the per curiam opinion)

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a concise per curiam affirmance without publishing detailed reasoning. By affirming, the panel concluded that the appellant's arguments did not warrant reversal. The lack of an appellee appearance and absence of a published opinion means the appellate court found no reversible error apparent on the record presented.

Parties

Appellant
Louis Serball
Appellee
Vanessa Bouaphanh
Judge
Susan G. Barthle

Key Dates

Opinion date
2026-04-22

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consider filing for further review

    If there are grounds for discretionary review, the appellant should consult counsel promptly about a petition to the Florida Supreme Court and confirm applicable filing deadlines.

  2. 2

    Request issuance of mandate

    If no further appeal will be pursued, the appellant or appellee can request issuance of the appellate mandate to conclude the appeal and allow the trial-court judgment to be enforced or carried out.

  3. 3

    Consult an attorney for enforcement or relief

    Parties should consult counsel on next steps in the trial court, such as enforcement of the judgment or pursuing any post-judgment relief now that the appeal is resolved.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appellate court decide?
The court affirmed the lower court's judgment, leaving the circuit court's decision in place.
Does this opinion explain why the court affirmed?
No; the court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without a published explanation of its reasoning.
Who is affected by this decision?
The parties to the case — appellant Louis Serball and appellee Vanessa Bouaphanh — are directly affected because the trial-court judgment remains final unless further review is sought.
Can the appellant seek further review?
Yes. The appellant may consider seeking discretionary review (for example, a petition to the Florida Supreme Court) if statutory criteria for review are met, subject to applicable deadlines.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                        SECOND DISTRICT




                              LOUIS SERBALL,

                                 Appellant,

                                      v.

                         VANESSA BOUAPHANH,

                                  Appellee.

                              No. 2D2025-2613


                               April 22, 2026

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Susan G. Barthle,
Judge.

Louis Serball, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.


PER CURIAM.

      Affirmed.

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.