Tomlinson v. Tomlinson, Jeffco Construction, Inc.
Docket 2D2025-2009
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2025-2009
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County
Summary
The appellate court reviewed Rhonda Gail Tomlinson’s appeal from a Hillsborough County circuit court judgment involving Jeff Allen Tomlinson and related business entities. The Second District issued a per curiam decision affirming the lower court’s ruling. The opinion is brief and contains no published reasoning; the panel simply affirmed the judgment below and noted concurrence by the three judges. No further factual findings, legal analysis, or modification of the trial court’s decision are included in the opinion.
Parties
- Appellant
- Rhonda Gail Tomlinson
- Appellee
- Jeff Allen Tomlinson
- Appellee
- Jeffco Construction, Inc.
- Appellee
- JRMT Holdings, LLC
- Judge
- Nancy L. Jacobs
- Attorney
- James R. Schaffer
- Attorney
- Amy D. Singer
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-05-01
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult appellate counsel
If you are the appellant and want to pursue further review, consult appellate counsel promptly to evaluate grounds for seeking discretionary review and applicable deadlines.
- 2
Review trial-court judgment
Parties should obtain and review the underlying trial-court judgment and record to determine precise effects of the affirmed decision and any obligations or enforcement steps.
- 3
Consider enforcement or compliance
If you are the prevailing party, consider actions to enforce the judgment; if you are required to comply with orders, take steps to comply or seek post-judgment relief if appropriate.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court’s judgment without published explanation.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The parties to the appeal—Rhonda Gail Tomlinson (appellant) and Jeff Allen Tomlinson and the named companies (appellees)—are directly affected; the trial court’s judgment remains in place.
- Does this opinion explain the court’s reasoning?
- No. The opinion is a brief per curiam affirmance and does not provide the court’s substantive reasoning.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- A party may seek discretionary review by a higher court (such as the Florida Supreme Court) subject to applicable rules and time limits, though the opinion does not address any pending motions or further review.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
RHONDA GAIL TOMLINSON,
Appellant,
v.
JEFF ALLEN TOMLINSON, JEFFCO CONSTRUCTION,
INC., and JRMT HOLDINGS, LLC,
Appellees.
No. 2D2025-2009
May 1, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Nancy L. Jacobs,
Judge.
James R. Schaffer of James R. Schaffer, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
Amy D. Singer of Probasco Singer Bayne, PLLC, Tampa, for Appellee Jeff
Allen Tomlinson.
No appearance for remaining Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and GUARD, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
2