Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Otavio Metzker
Docket 4D2024-2852
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Civil
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 4D2024-2852
Appeal from a final judgment of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County (case no. 062020CA020823AXXXCE).
Summary
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower-court judgment in favor of Otavio Metzker against Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company. The appeal arose from Broward County circuit court proceedings (case no. 062020CA020823AXXXCE). The appellate panel, in a per curiam opinion with concurrence by all judges, issued a simple affirmance without extended opinion. The decision is subject to possible change if a timely motion for rehearing is filed and resolved.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's judgment in favor of the appellee should be reversed by the district court of appeal
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a published opinion, indicating it found no reversible error in the lower court's proceedings or decision. Because the opinion contains no separate analysis, the appellate court's action signals that the record and relevant law supported the trial court's ruling. Any further change depends on a timely rehearing motion by the appellant.
Parties
- Appellant
- Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company
- Appellee
- Otavio Metzker
- Judge
- Keathan Briscoe Frink
Key Dates
- District court decision date
- 2026-04-23
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing motion for rehearing
The appellant should evaluate and, if warranted, file a timely motion for rehearing in the Fourth District to preserve arguments and seek reconsideration.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If rehearing is denied, the appellant should consult counsel about the possibility and standards for seeking discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court.
- 3
Prepare to implement trial-court judgment
The prevailing party should monitor deadlines and, after the rehearing period expires or is resolved, take steps to enforce or collect on the trial-court judgment as appropriate.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appellate court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's judgment in favor of Otavio Metzker.
- Does this decision end the case?
- Not necessarily; the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved, and further appellate options may remain.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The parties directly affected are Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company (the appellant) and Otavio Metzker (the appellee).
- Can the appellant do anything now?
- The appellant can file a timely motion for rehearing in the district court; if rehearing is denied, it may consider seeking review by the Florida Supreme Court if appropriate.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
OTAVIO METZKER,
Appellee.
No. 4D2024-2852
[April 23, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Keathan Briscoe Frink, Judge; L.T. Case No.
062020CA020823AXXXCE.
David A. Noel and Kara Rockenbach Link of Link & Rockenbach, P.A.,
West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Douglas H. Stein of Douglas H. Stein, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KUNTZ, C.J., MAY, J., and SHERMAN, JAMES, Associate Judge, concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.