What did the court decide?

The court dismissed the petition for a writ of certiorari and issued no extended opinion explaining the reasons.

Who is affected by this decision?

The petitioner, Neelam Uppal, and the listed respondents including the condominium association, management companies, mortgage entities, and individual parties named in the petition.

Because the petition was dismissed, the circuit court's underlying action remains undisturbed; the petitioner may consider other appellate remedies if available.

Can this dismissal be appealed?

A dismissal of a certiorari petition by the district court is typically final for that petition, but a party should consult an attorney promptly to determine if any further review or alternative relief is possible.

Uppal v. Las Palmas Condominium Association, Hadad

Docket 2D2025-2440

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilDismissed

Filed: Apr 22, 2026 · 1 week ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Dismissed
Docket: 2D2025-2440

Petition for writ of certiorari to the circuit court for Pinellas County from a pro se petitioner

Summary

The Second District Court of Appeal dismissed Neelam Uppal’s petition for a writ of certiorari challenging a Pinellas County circuit court decision. The petition named multiple respondents including a condominium association, management companies, mortgage entities, and individual defendants. The court issued a short per curiam order simply stating “Dismissed” without extended reasoning, and three judges concurred. The filing indicates counsel appearances for some respondents and no appearance for others; the opinion is subject to revision before official publication.

Issue Decided

Whether the petition for a writ of certiorari presented a basis for relief from the circuit court's action

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is a one-line per curiam dismissal and does not provide the court's substantive reasoning. Because the court only stated “Dismissed,” no operative legal analysis or factual application is included in the published order.

Parties

Petitioner: Neelam Uppal
Respondent: Las Palmas Condominium Association
Respondent: Wisam Mohammad Hadad
Respondent: YHL Capital, LLC
Respondent: Jennifer Zielinski
Respondent: Sentry Management, Inc
Respondent: Universal Protection Services, LLC
Respondent: The Bank of New York Mellon
Respondent: Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Attorney: Jason Michael Azzarone
Attorney: Charles Gallagher
Judge: Rebecca L. Hamilton

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-22

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel
The petitioner should promptly consult an experienced appellate attorney to evaluate whether other appellate or post-judgment options exist and to advise on deadlines.
2
Review circuit court status
Confirm the current status of the underlying circuit court proceeding to determine whether any further filings or compliance are required.
3
Consider motion for rehearing or clarification
If appropriate and timely, the petitioner may explore filing a motion for rehearing or clarification in the district court to request the court’s reasons or reconsideration.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The court dismissed the petition for a writ of certiorari and issued no extended opinion explaining the reasons.
Who is affected by this decision?: The petitioner, Neelam Uppal, and the listed respondents including the condominium association, management companies, mortgage entities, and individual parties named in the petition.
What happens next?: Because the petition was dismissed, the circuit court's underlying action remains undisturbed; the petitioner may consider other appellate remedies if available.
Can this dismissal be appealed?: A dismissal of a certiorari petition by the district court is typically final for that petition, but a party should consult an attorney promptly to determine if any further review or alternative relief is possible.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                        SECOND DISTRICT




                             NEELAM UPPAL,

                                 Petitioner,

                                     v.

  LAS PALMAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION; WISAM MOHAMMAD
     HADAD; YHL CAPITAL, LLC; JENNIFER ZIELINSKI; SENTRY
 MANAGEMENT, INC; UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES, LLC; THE
 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC.,

                               Respondents.

                             No. 2D2025-2440


                               April 22, 2026

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Pinellas County;
Rebecca L. Hamilton, Judge.

Neelam Uppal, pro se.

Jason Michael Azzarone of LaCava Jacobson & Goodis, P.A., Tampa, for
Respondents Las Palmas Condominium Association and Sentry
Management, Inc.

Charles Gallagher of Gallagher & Associates Law Firm, P.A., St.
Petersburg, for Respondents Wisam Mohammad Hadad and YHL Capital,
LLC.

No Appearance for remaining Respondents.

PER CURIAM.
      Dismissed.

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.




                                      2