Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Valerie Williams v. Horace Williams

Docket 4D2025-1387

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Case type
Civil
Disposition
Affirmed
Docket
4D2025-1387

Appeal from a circuit court decision in a civil case (Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County).

Summary

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision in a civil case between Valerie Williams (appellant) and Horace Williams (appellee). The appeal arose from a Broward County circuit court matter (case no. 062023CA015644AXXXCE). The appellate panel, writing per curiam, concluded the trial court's ruling should stand and issued a short dispositive opinion simply stating "Affirmed." The court noted the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the trial court's ruling in the underlying civil action should be reversed on appeal

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is per curiam and provides a brief disposition without elaboration; the appellate court determined the trial court's decision was correct and required no reversal. Because the court affirmed, it implicitly found no reversible error in the trial court's proceedings or legal conclusions. The opinion does not set out detailed legal analysis or factual findings in this short affirmance.

Parties

Appellant
Valerie Williams
Appellee
Horace Williams
Judge
Nickolaus Hunter Davis
Attorney
Peter Sylvester Adrien
Attorney
Alex Paul Rosenthal

Key Dates

Opinion date
2026-04-23

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consider filing a motion for rehearing

    If the losing party believes there are grounds, they should timely file a motion for rehearing in the district court before the judgment becomes final.

  2. 2

    Evaluate merits of further review

    After resolution of any rehearing motion, consult counsel about whether to seek discretionary review from the Florida Supreme Court, assessing likelihood of review and applicable deadlines.

  3. 3

    Proceed with enforcement or compliance

    The prevailing party should take steps to enforce or implement the affirmed trial-court judgment once the appellate decision becomes final.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision, meaning it upheld the trial court's ruling.
Who is affected by this decision?
The parties to the appeal, appellant Valerie Williams and appellee Horace Williams, are directly affected; the underlying civil case's disposition stands as affirmed.
Is this decision final now?
Not immediately; the opinion states it is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.
Can this be appealed further?
Potentially yes; after disposition of any motion for rehearing, a party could seek further review, such as filing a petition for discretionary review to the Florida Supreme Court, subject to applicable rules and deadlines.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                               FOURTH DISTRICT

                          VALERIE WILLIAMS,
                              Appellant,

                                      v.

                          HORACE WILLIAMS,
                              Appellee.

                            No. 4D2025-1387

                               [April 23, 2026]

   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Nickolaus Hunter Davis, Judge; L.T. Case No.
062023CA015644AXXXCE.

  Peter Sylvester Adrien of Law Offices of Peter S. Adrien, P.A., Miami, for
appellant.

   Alex Paul Rosenthal of Rosenthal Law Group, Weston, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   Affirmed.

KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

                           *          *           *

   Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.