What did the court decide?

The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment and denied the appeal by Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc.

Who is affected by the decision?

The parties to the case—Worldwide Aircraft Services (JET ICU) and the two Blue Cross entities—are directly affected because the trial-court outcome stands.

Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?

No. The opinion is a brief per curiam affirmance and does not include detailed reasoning or analysis in the provided text.

Can the appellant seek further review?

Possibly. The appellant may consider filing a motion for rehearing in the district court or seeking review from the Florida Supreme Court if jurisdictional criteria are met, but specific deadlines and grounds should be confirmed with counsel.

Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc., Jet ICU v. Worldwide Insurance Services, LLC., Geoblue

Docket 2D2025-1594

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

CivilAffirmed

Filed: Apr 17, 2026 · 2 weeks ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Civil
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 2D2025-1594

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County (trial court judgment reviewed by the District Court of Appeal).

Summary

The Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision in a dispute between Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc. (doing business as JET ICU) and two Blue Cross entities. The appeal challenged the circuit court's judgment, but the appellate court, in a per curiam opinion, concluded that the lower-court ruling should stand and issued an affirmance without published opinion. The panel unanimously agreed to affirm, with no extended written analysis included in the opinion provided.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court's judgment (in the dispute between Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc. and the Blue Cross entities) should be reversed on appeal.

Court's Reasoning

The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance, indicating it found no reversible error in the trial court's handling or judgment. Because the opinion as provided contains no extended reasoning or analysis, the specific legal rule application and factual determinations underlying the affirmance are not stated in the opinion excerpt.

Parties

Appellant: Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc. d/b/a JET ICU
Appellee: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.
Appellee: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina
Judge: Jennifer X. Gabbard
Attorney: Michael Brannigan
Attorney: Daniel Alter
Attorney: Eric Yesner
Attorney: Timothy J. Conner
Attorney: Emily R. McWey

Key Dates

Appellate decision date: 2026-04-17

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel about rehearing or further review
If the appellant wishes to pursue further relief, consult counsel promptly about filing a motion for rehearing in the appellate court or seeking discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court, and confirm applicable deadlines.
2
Assess trial-court judgment implementation
The prevailing parties should review the trial-court judgment to determine enforcement steps or post-judgment procedures, such as collection or entry of fees and costs.
3
Obtain and review full opinion or mandate
Request the full appellate mandate and any underlying trial-court orders to understand the precise rulings affirmed and any obligations that follow.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment and denied the appeal by Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc.
Who is affected by the decision?: The parties to the case—Worldwide Aircraft Services (JET ICU) and the two Blue Cross entities—are directly affected because the trial-court outcome stands.
Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?: No. The opinion is a brief per curiam affirmance and does not include detailed reasoning or analysis in the provided text.
Can the appellant seek further review?: Possibly. The appellant may consider filing a motion for rehearing in the district court or seeking review from the Florida Supreme Court if jurisdictional criteria are met, but specific deadlines and grounds should be confirmed with counsel.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                       SECOND DISTRICT



       WORLDWIDE AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC. d/b/a JET ICU,

                               Appellant,

                                   v.

       BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC., and
       BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

                               Appellees.


                           No. 2D2025-1594



                             April 17, 2026

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Jennifer X.
Gabbard, Judge.

Michael Brannigan of The Law Office of Michael Brannigan, P.A., Tampa,
for Appellant.

Daniel Alter and Eric Yesner of GrayRobinson, P.A., Fort Lauderdale,
for Appellee Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida.

Timothy J. Conner and Emily R. McWey of Holland & Knight LLP,
Jacksonville, for Appellee Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina.


PER CURIAM.

     Affirmed.
LUCAS, C.J., and KELLY and SMITH, JJ., Concur.


Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.




                                     -2-