Antwan D. Johnson v. State of Florida
Docket 6D2025-0058
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 6D2025-0058
Appeal from the circuit court for Polk County pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2).
Summary
The Sixth District Court of Appeal reviewed Antwan D. Johnson's appeal from a Polk County circuit court decision and, in a short per curiam order, affirmed the lower court's judgment. The opinion is brief, contains no published reasoning, and the panel of judges concurred. The decision was issued April 21, 2026, and notes that it is not final until the time to file a motion for rehearing expires and any timely motion is resolved.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's judgment in the underlying criminal matter should be reversed on appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2).
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is a per curiam affirmance with no elaborated reasoning in the published text. The panel concluded the appellant's arguments did not warrant reversal and therefore affirmed the circuit court's judgment. Because the court issued a short-form affirmance, specific legal analysis and fact-by-fact application are not provided in this document.
Parties
- Appellant
- Antwan D. Johnson
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Michelle O. Pincket
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier
- Attorney
- Marilyn Frances Muir
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-21
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant wishes to challenge the affirmance, he may timely file a motion for rehearing in the Sixth District Court of Appeal within the applicable deadline.
- 2
Consult appellate counsel
The appellant should consult an attorney experienced in criminal appeals to evaluate grounds for rehearing or further review, including potential discretionary review to the Florida Supreme Court.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The court affirmed the lower court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error in the circuit court's decision as presented in this appeal.
- Does the decision explain the court's reasoning?
- No. The order is a brief per curiam affirmance and does not include detailed legal analysis or factual findings.
- Is this decision final?
- Not immediately — the opinion notes it is not final until the time to file a motion for rehearing expires and any timely motion is resolved.
- Who is affected by this ruling?
- The primary parties affected are the appellant, Antwan D. Johnson, and the State of Florida, as the affirmance leaves the circuit court's judgment in place.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 6D2025-0058
Lower Tribunal No. 2014-CF-004642
_____________________________
ANTWAN D. JOHNSON,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County.
Michelle O. Pincket, Judge.
April 21, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
WHITE, MIZE and PRATT, JJ., concur.
Antwan D. Johnson, Cross City, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marilyn Frances Muir, Chief
Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED