What did the appeals court decide?

The appeals court affirmed the circuit court's judgment and sentence; the conviction/sentence stands as affirmed.

Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?

No; the court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without a written opinion explaining its reasoning.

Who is affected by this decision?

The appellant, Aron Rodriguez-Villasana, is directly affected because his appeal was denied and the State is confirmed as the prevailing party.

Can this decision be challenged further?

Potential further steps could include filing a motion for rehearing with the district court within the allowed time, and if denied, seeking review by the Florida Supreme Court if jurisdictional criteria are met.

Aron Rodriguez-Villasana v. State of Florida

Docket 6D2024-0663

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 21, 2026 · 1 week ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 6D2024-0663

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County

Summary

The Sixth District Court of Appeal reviewed a criminal appeal by Aron Rodriguez-Villasana from the Polk County circuit court under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The court issued a per curiam opinion on April 21, 2026, affirming the lower court's judgment. No separate written opinion or explanation of reasoning is provided in the published entry; the panel of three judges concurred. The decision becomes final when the time to file a motion for rehearing expires or any filed rehearing motion is resolved.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court's judgment and sentence should be reversed or otherwise modified on appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is per curiam and provides no substantive explanation; the appellate panel affirmed the lower court's decision without a published statement of the court's legal analysis. The absence of an opinion indicates the judges concluded the appellant's arguments lacked merit or did not require further elaboration under the standards governing appeals in this posture.

Parties

Appellant: Aron Rodriguez-Villasana
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Susan L. Barber
Judge: Traver, C.J.
Judge: Stargel, J.
Judge: Brownlee, J.

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-21

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes there are grounds, timely file a motion for rehearing in the Sixth District within the rule-prescribed period to preserve issues and possibly obtain further explanation.
2
Evaluate petition to the Florida Supreme Court
If rehearing is denied or not pursued, consult counsel about whether to seek discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court and whether the case raises questions of great public importance or conflict.
3
Consult counsel about post-conviction options
Discuss with an attorney any available collateral relief (for example, a motion under Florida Rule 3.850) if there are claims not suitable for direct appeal.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The appeals court affirmed the circuit court's judgment and sentence; the conviction/sentence stands as affirmed.
Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?: No; the court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without a written opinion explaining its reasoning.
Who is affected by this decision?: The appellant, Aron Rodriguez-Villasana, is directly affected because his appeal was denied and the State is confirmed as the prevailing party.
Can this decision be challenged further?: Potential further steps could include filing a motion for rehearing with the district court within the allowed time, and if denied, seeking review by the Florida Supreme Court if jurisdictional criteria are met.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                          STATE OF FLORIDA
                         _____________________________

                              Case No. 6D2024-0663
                        Lower Tribunal No. CF13-008817-XX
                         _____________________________

                           ARON RODRIGUEZ-VILLASANA,

                                      Appellant,
                                          v.

                                 STATE OF FLORIDA,

                                      Appellee.
                         _____________________________

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County.
                               Susan L. Barber, Judge.

                                    April 21, 2026

  PER CURIAM.

        AFFIRMED.

  TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.


  Aron Rodriguez-Villasana, Bristol, pro se.

  James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant
  Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


    NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
                AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED