Bailey v. State of Florida
Docket 2D2025-2983
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2025-2983
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County
Summary
The Second District Court of Appeal of Florida reviewed a pro se appeal by Labronx Bailey from a Hillsborough County circuit court order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The appellate court, in a per curiam opinion, affirmed the lower court's decision. No substantive reasoning or opinion text is provided in the published entry beyond the single-word disposition and concurrence by three judges. The opinion may be revised before official publication.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's order subject to review under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) should be reversed
Court's Reasoning
The published docket entry contains only a per curiam affirmance without an opinion explaining the court's reasoning. As a result, the appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling; no legal analysis or factual application is included in this entry.
Parties
- Appellant
- Labronx Bailey
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Michelle Sisco
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-29
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult appellate counsel
If you wish to pursue further review, consult an attorney promptly to evaluate whether to seek discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court and to identify any jurisdictional deadlines.
- 2
Request clarification or opinion
If the reasons for affirmance are needed, counsel may request the court's opinion if one exists or check for a subsequently published opinion or mandate.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The appeals court affirmed the circuit court's decision; the short entry gives no additional explanation.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The appellant, Labronx Bailey, and the State of Florida are directly affected; the affirmation leaves the lower-court judgment in place.
- Does this entry explain the court's reasoning?
- No; the entry is a per curiam affirmance that does not include substantive reasoning or analysis.
- Can this be appealed further?
- Potentially, a party could seek review by the Florida Supreme Court, but the entry does not address preservation of issues or jurisdictional steps for further appeal.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
LABRONX BAILEY,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-2983
April 29, 2026
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for
Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge.
Labronx Bailey, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
MORRIS, SLEET, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.