Bridges Avery Grossi v. State of Florida
Docket 4D2025-2074
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 4D2025-2074
Appeal from a criminal conviction and sentence in the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County (trial court case no. 312021CF001034AXXXXX).
Summary
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's judgment in a criminal appeal by Bridges Avery Grossi. The appeal arose from a conviction and sentence entered in the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County. The appellate court issued a brief per curiam opinion affirming the trial court's decision without published opinion and noted that the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.
Issue Decided
- Whether the trial court's judgment and sentence should be reversed on appeal (specific issues not detailed in the opinion).
Court's Reasoning
The court issued a per curiam affirmation, indicating the panel found no reversible error in the trial court's proceedings or sentencing. Because the opinion contains no published reasoning, the affirmation rests on the panel's determination that the record did not support relief for the appellant. The court also noted that its decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.
Parties
- Appellant
- Bridges Avery Grossi
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Robert Meadows
- Attorney
- Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender
- Attorney
- Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-04-23
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing a motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes there are grounds, file a timely motion for rehearing in the Fourth District to preserve issues and delay finality.
- 2
Evaluate further review options
If rehearing is denied, consult counsel about seeking discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court and prepare a jurisdictional brief if appropriate.
- 3
Prepare for sentence/custody implications
Coordinate with counsel and the correctional authority about the practical effects of the affirmation on custody, sentencing credits, or post-conviction remedies.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The court affirmed the trial court's judgment and sentence, meaning the conviction and sentence remain in place for now.
- Is this the final outcome?
- Not yet — the decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The appellant, Bridges Avery Grossi, is directly affected because the affirmation upholds his conviction and sentence; the State of Florida is the appellee.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- After resolution of any rehearing motion, the appellant may seek further review, such as a petition to the Florida Supreme Court, subject to that court's jurisdiction and rules.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
BRIDGES AVERY GROSSI,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2074
[April 23, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,
Indian River County; Robert Meadows, Judge; L.T. Case No.
312021CF001034AXXXXX.
Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public
Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CIKLIN, LEVINE and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.