Calvin W. Thomas v. State of Florida
Docket 5D2024-1413
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 5D2024-1413
Appeal from a criminal conviction and sentence in the Circuit Court for Seminole County (case no. 2021-CF-002818-A).
Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment in a criminal case. Calvin W. Thomas appealed a Seminole County circuit court decision; the appellate panel issued a brief per curiam opinion on April 28, 2026, simply stating AFFIRMED. The court did not elaborate its reasoning in the published entry and the three-judge panel concurred. No additional factual findings, legal analysis, or instructions were included in the opinion.
Issue Decided
- Whether the trial court's judgment in the underlying criminal case should be reversed (specific issues not stated in the opinion).
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is a per curiam affirmance and contains no stated reasoning. The panel affirmed the lower court's judgment without explanation, indicating the appellate court found no reversible error on the record before it.
Parties
- Appellant
- Calvin W. Thomas
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- William S. Orth
- Attorney
- Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender
- Attorney
- Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier, Attorney General
- Attorney
- Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General
Key Dates
- District court decision date
- 2026-04-28
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consider filing motions in the district court
If appropriate, the appellant can file timely and authorized motions under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 (rehearing) or 9.331 (certification), as noted in the opinion.
- 2
Evaluate seeking Florida Supreme Court review
If there are substantial federal or state law issues or conflicts among districts, counsel should assess whether to seek discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court and prepare a jurisdictional brief if warranted.
- 3
Consult counsel about post-affirmance options
Defense counsel should advise the appellant on collateral remedies or sentencing relief options, and ensure compliance with any remaining obligations arising from the affirmed judgment.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the appeals court decide?
- The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision, meaning the lower-court judgment stands.
- Who does this affect?
- It affects appellant Calvin W. Thomas and the State of Florida; the underlying conviction or sentence affirmed remains in effect for Mr. Thomas.
- Why did the court affirm?
- The opinion gives no explanation; it is a short per curiam affirmance stating only AFFIRMED, so no reasons were provided in the written entry.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- A party may seek discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court, subject to its rules and deadlines, or file any timely and authorized motions in the district court under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2024-1413
LT Case No. 2021-CF-002818-A
_____________________________
CALVIN W. THOMAS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County.
William S. Orth, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan,
Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P.
Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for
Appellee.
April 28, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
MAKAR, SOUD, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
2