What did the appeals court decide?

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision, meaning it found no reversible error in the convictions or rulings challenged on appeal.

Who is affected by this decision?

The primary parties affected are appellant Carl Joseph Johnson and the State of Florida; the affirmation leaves the lower-court outcome in place.

Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?

No. The published disposition is a brief per curiam affirmance and does not include detailed reasoning or analysis in the text provided.

Can this be appealed further?

A defendant may seek further review, such as filing a motion for rehearing in the district court or seeking discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court if jurisdictional criteria are met.

Carl Joseph Johnson v. State of Florida

Docket 5D2024-0703

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 21, 2026 · 1 week ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 5D2024-0703

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County in consolidated criminal cases (LT Case Nos. 2013-CF-001970-A and 2022-CF-002525-A)

Summary

The Fifth District Court of Appeal reviewed Carl Joseph Johnson's appeal from Seminole County circuit court criminal proceedings and, in a brief per curiam decision dated April 21, 2026, affirmed the lower court's ruling. The opinion contains no extended explanation or reasoning, and the panel (Chief Judge Jay and Judges Eisnaugle and Boatwright) issued a unanimous affirmance. The mandate is subject to timely post-judgment motions under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Issue Decided

Whether the circuit court's rulings in the referenced criminal cases should be reversed on appeal

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is a short per curiam affirmance that does not provide detailed legal reasoning in the published text. The appellate court concluded the issues raised by appellant did not warrant reversal and therefore affirmed the lower court's judgment. No further factual or legal analysis is included in the decision text provided.

Parties

Appellant: Carl Joseph Johnson
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Melanie Chase
Attorney: William R. Ponall
Attorney: Eric J. Sorice
Attorney: James Uthmeier
Attorney: Kurt T. Koehler

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-21

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider post-judgment motions
If the appellant wants to preserve or renew arguments, file any timely and authorized motions for rehearing or clarification under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 within the procedural deadlines.
2
Evaluate grounds for further review
Consult counsel to determine whether to seek discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court based on conflict or important legal questions; review deadlines for a petition for review.
3
Prepare for enforcement of trial judgment
If no further relief is sought, the State and trial court may proceed with enforcing the judgment and sentence as affirmed by the appellate court.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the appeals court decide?: The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's decision, meaning it found no reversible error in the convictions or rulings challenged on appeal.
Who is affected by this decision?: The primary parties affected are appellant Carl Joseph Johnson and the State of Florida; the affirmation leaves the lower-court outcome in place.
Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?: No. The published disposition is a brief per curiam affirmance and does not include detailed reasoning or analysis in the text provided.
Can this be appealed further?: A defendant may seek further review, such as filing a motion for rehearing in the district court or seeking discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court if jurisdictional criteria are met.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                      Case No. 5D2024-0703
                 LT Case Nos. 2013-CF-001970-A
                              2022-CF-002525-A
                  ____________________________

CARL JOSEPH JOHNSON,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County.
Melanie Chase, Judge.

William R. Ponall and Eric J. Sorice, of Ponall Law, Maitland,
for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kurt T.
Koehler, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for
Appellee.

                         April 21, 2026

PER CURIAM.

    AFFIRMED.

JAY, C.J., and EISNAUGLE and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
          _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
           _____________________________




                       2