What did the court decide?

The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision; the brief entry states simply 'Affirmed' without elaboration.

Who is affected by this decision?

The primary parties affected are appellant Jason Casanas and the State of Florida, as the affirmance leaves the circuit court's ruling in place.

Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?

No; the published entry is a short per curiam affirmation and does not include substantive reasoning or analysis.

Can this be appealed further?

Potential further review may be available to a higher court (such as the Florida Supreme Court) depending on procedural rules and whether a timely petition for review is filed, but the entry does not address that.

Casanas v. State of Florida

Docket 2D2024-2543

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 29, 2026 · 2 days ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 2D2024-2543

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County

Summary

The Second District Court of Appeal of Florida considered an appeal by Jason Casanas from a decision of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The appellate court issued a brief per curiam opinion concluding that the circuit court's ruling should be affirmed. No extended reasoning, factual background, or specific legal issues are discussed in the published entry; the panel of judges concurred and the opinion was filed April 29, 2026.

Parties

Appellant: Jason Casanas
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Nick Nazaretian
Attorney: Jason M. Bard
Attorney: James Uthmeier
Attorney: Nicole Rochelle Smith

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-29

What You Should Do Next

1
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If the appellant wishes to seek additional review, consult counsel immediately about filing a timely petition for discretionary review to the Florida Supreme Court or other appropriate post-judgment relief.
2
Confirm mandate and compliance
Determine whether the appellate court will issue a mandate and ensure compliance with the affirmed circuit court order or sentence.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision; the brief entry states simply 'Affirmed' without elaboration.
Who is affected by this decision?: The primary parties affected are appellant Jason Casanas and the State of Florida, as the affirmance leaves the circuit court's ruling in place.
Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?: No; the published entry is a short per curiam affirmation and does not include substantive reasoning or analysis.
Can this be appealed further?: Potential further review may be available to a higher court (such as the Florida Supreme Court) depending on procedural rules and whether a timely petition for review is filed, but the entry does not address that.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
                        SECOND DISTRICT

                             JASON CASANAS,

                                 Appellant,

                                      v.

                           STATE OF FLORIDA,

                                  Appellee.

                             No. 2D2024-2543


                               April 29, 2026

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Nick Nazaretian,
Judge.

Jason M. Bard of Greater Tampa Law, PL, Tampa, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nicole Rochelle
Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


PER CURIAM.

      Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, ATKINSON, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.


Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.