Live courthouse data across 10 states. Pro users get alerted instantly on every filing. Get started

Chaunice Kendrick v. State of Florida

Docket 4D2025-2985

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed
Filed
Jurisdiction
Florida
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type
Opinion
Disposition
Affirmed
Docket
4D2025-2985

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County (criminal case).

Summary

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment in the criminal case of Chaunice Kendrick v. State of Florida. The panel issued a brief per curiam decision, concluding the appellant's challenges did not warrant reversal. The opinion is concise, notes concurrence by all three judges, and indicates the decision is not final pending any timely motion for rehearing. No further reasoning or factual explanation is included in the published entry.

Issue Decided

  • Whether the trial court's judgment should be reversed on the grounds raised by the appellant (specific issues not detailed in the opinion).

Court's Reasoning

The court issued a per curiam disposition affirming the lower court, indicating the appellant's arguments did not justify reversal. The opinion does not provide detailed legal analysis or cite specific legal rules; the panel simply concluded the trial court's decision should stand. The decision remains subject to reconsideration if the appellant timely files a motion for rehearing.

Parties

Appellant
Chaunice Kendrick
Appellee
State of Florida
Judge
Susan Lynn Alspector
Attorney
Daniel Eisinger
Attorney
Paul Edward Petillo
Attorney
James Uthmeier
Attorney
Mary Elizabeth Johnson

Key Dates

Decision date
2026-04-23

What You Should Do Next

  1. 1

    Consider filing a motion for rehearing

    If counsel believes there are grounds, file a timely motion for rehearing in the Fourth District to ask the court to reconsider its per curiam affirmance.

  2. 2

    Consult appellate counsel about further review

    Discuss with counsel whether to seek further review (for example, a petition to the Florida Supreme Court) and the likelihood of success given the per curiam affirmance.

  3. 3

    Prepare to proceed under the affirmed judgment

    If no rehearing or further review is filed or is unsuccessful, take steps necessary to comply with the trial-court judgment or to pursue any postconviction remedies available.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, meaning it found no reversible error in the matters the appellant raised.
Who is affected by this decision?
The decision affects the appellant, Chaunice Kendrick, and the State of Florida as the appellee; it leaves the lower-court outcome in place unless rehearing is granted.
Can the appellant do anything next?
Yes. The decision is not final until any timely motion for rehearing is resolved; the appellant may file a motion for rehearing or seek further appellate review if permitted.
Does the opinion explain the court's reasoning?
No. The opinion is a brief per curiam affirmance and does not include detailed legal reasoning or citations.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                             FOURTH DISTRICT

                       CHAUNICE KENDRICK,
                            Appellant,

                                    v.

                        STATE OF FLORIDA,
                             Appellee.

                          No. 4D2025-2985

                             [April 23, 2026]

   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Susan Lynn Alspector, Judge; L.T. Case No.
062025CF008176A88810.

  Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant
Public Defender, West Palm Beach for appellant.

   James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary Elizabeth
Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

  Affirmed.

LEVINE, CONNER and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.

                         *          *           *

  Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.