What did the court decide?

The appellate court affirmed the lower court's judgment in Christopher Coaxum's criminal appeal, meaning the conviction or ruling being appealed remains in place.

Who is affected by this decision?

The primary parties affected are the appellant, Christopher Coaxum, and the State of Florida; any collateral consequences tied to the underlying conviction are also affected.

Why didn't the court explain its reasoning?

The court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without a written opinion, which indicates the panel found no need to publish reasoning in this order.

Can this decision be further appealed?

Possibly. The decision may be subject to a motion for rehearing in the district court and, if proper, an appeal to the Florida Supreme Court, subject to that court's jurisdiction and filing deadlines.

Christopher Coaxum v. State of Florida

Docket 6D2023-3868

Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research

Criminal AppealAffirmed

Filed: Apr 28, 2026 · 3 days ago
Jurisdiction: Florida
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Type: Opinion
Case type: Criminal Appeal
Disposition: Affirmed
Docket: 6D2023-3868

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County in a criminal matter (Lower Tribunal No. CF19-000211-XX).

Summary

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's judgment in the criminal case of Christopher Coaxum. The appellate court issued a brief per curiam decision on April 28, 2026, concluding that the lower court's ruling should stand. No published opinion, explanation, or separate opinion accompanied the affirmance; the panel judges Nardella, Smith, and Kamoutsas concurred. The appellant was represented by counsel from Cohen Law, P.A., and the State by assistant attorneys general. The decision is subject to the normal rehearing deadline.

Issue Decided

Whether the trial court's judgment or ruling in the criminal case should be reversed on appeal.

Court's Reasoning

The opinion is a per curiam affirmance without an accompanying written opinion explaining the court's reasoning. By affirming, the appellate panel implicitly found no reversible error in the trial court's proceedings or rulings that warranted reversal. The lack of a published opinion means the court did not articulate the specific legal rule application in this order.

Parties

Appellant: Christopher Coaxum
Appellee: State of Florida
Judge: Jalal A. Harb
Attorney: Lee Adam Cohen
Attorney: Angela H. Fernandez
Attorney: Christopher Manon

Key Dates

Decision date: 2026-04-28

What You Should Do Next

1
Consider filing motion for rehearing
If the appellant believes there are grounds, file a timely motion for rehearing in the Sixth District Court of Appeal before the rehearing deadline expires.
2
Evaluate petition to the Florida Supreme Court
If rehearing is denied or not pursued, counsel should assess whether to seek review by the Florida Supreme Court and prepare a jurisdictional brief if there are substantial legal questions.
3
Consult counsel about post-conviction options
Discuss with appellate or post-conviction counsel whether collateral relief (for example, a motion for postconviction relief) is available based on the case's facts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the court decide?: The appellate court affirmed the lower court's judgment in Christopher Coaxum's criminal appeal, meaning the conviction or ruling being appealed remains in place.
Who is affected by this decision?: The primary parties affected are the appellant, Christopher Coaxum, and the State of Florida; any collateral consequences tied to the underlying conviction are also affected.
Why didn't the court explain its reasoning?: The court issued a brief per curiam affirmance without a written opinion, which indicates the panel found no need to publish reasoning in this order.
Can this decision be further appealed?: Possibly. The decision may be subject to a motion for rehearing in the district court and, if proper, an appeal to the Florida Supreme Court, subject to that court's jurisdiction and filing deadlines.

The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.

Full Filing Text

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                       STATE OF FLORIDA
                     _____________________________

                          Case No. 6D2023-3868
                    Lower Tribunal No. CF19-000211-XX
                     _____________________________

                           CHRISTOPHER COAXUM,

                                 Appellant,

                                      v.

                             STATE OF FLORIDA,

                                  Appellee.

                     _____________________________

                Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County.
                            Jalal A. Harb, Judge.

                               April 28, 2026

PER CURIAM.

     AFFIRMED.

NARDELLA, SMITH and KAMOUTSAS, JJ., concur.


Lee Adam Cohen, of Cohen Law, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Angela H. Fernandez and
Christopher Manon, Assistant Attorneys General, Tampa, for Appellee.


 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
          AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED