Conaway v. State of Florida
Docket 2D2024-2074
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2024-2074
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County (criminal matter).
Summary
The appellate court reviewed an appeal by Jermaine Roshell Conaway from a Manatee County circuit court decision and summarily affirmed the lower court's ruling. The opinion is per curiam, issued May 6, 2026, and the panel (Silberman, Villanti, and Atkinson, JJ.) concurred. No written opinion or extended reasoning appears in the provided text beyond the single-word disposition "Affirmed." The judgment of the circuit court therefore stands as decided below.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's decision below should be overturned on the grounds presented by the appellant.
Court's Reasoning
The provided document contains only a per curiam affirmance without elaboration of the court's reasoning. Because no opinion or analysis is included, the appellate court's basis for affirming is not stated in the text supplied.
Parties
- Appellant
- Jermaine Roshell Conaway
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Stephen Mathew Whyte
- Attorney
- Blair Allen, Public Defender
- Attorney
- Lisa Martin, Assistant Public Defender
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier, Attorney General
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-05-06
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult counsel about further review
If the appellant wishes to pursue additional review (for example, discretionary review by the Florida Supreme Court), they should consult their attorney promptly about deadlines and grounds for review.
- 2
Request opinion or mandate details
Counsel or a party should request the court's mandate and check the clerk's office for any opinion or additional docket entries explaining the basis for the affirmance.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision, meaning it left the circuit court's judgment in place.
- Does the opinion explain why the court affirmed?
- No. The document is a brief per curiam affirmance and does not include the court's reasoning in the text provided.
- Who is affected by this decision?
- The principal parties affected are the appellant, Jermaine Roshell Conaway, and the State of Florida; the circuit court's ruling that was appealed remains effective.
- Can this decision be appealed further?
- Potential further review may be available to a higher court in limited circumstances, but the document does not state whether such review was pursued or allowed.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
JERMAINE ROSHELL CONAWAY,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2024-2074
May 6, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Stephen Mathew
Whyte, Judge.
Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Lisa Martin, Assistant Public Defender,
Bartow, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.