Cullen v. State of Florida
Docket 2D2024-2600
Court of record · Indexed in NoticeRegistry archive · AI-enriched for research
- Filed
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Court
- District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Type
- Opinion
- Case type
- Criminal Appeal
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 2D2024-2600
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County (criminal matter).
Summary
The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the criminal matter of Scott Warren Cullen v. State of Florida. The appeal challenged an order from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, but the appellate court, in a per curiam decision, unanimously affirmed the judgment below. No extended opinion or separate written reasoning was provided in the published entry; the court's brief ruling concludes the appeal lacks merit and upholds the trial-court outcome.
Issue Decided
- Whether the circuit court's order in the criminal case should be reversed on appeal.
Court's Reasoning
The opinion is a per curiam affirmance without published explanation, indicating the appellate panel concluded the trial court's ruling was correct and did not warrant reversal. The unanimous concurrence by the three judges signals the panel found no reversible error in the record. Because no written opinion was issued, the court did not elaborate on legal rules or factual application.
Parties
- Appellant
- Scott Warren Cullen
- Appellee
- State of Florida
- Judge
- Donna M. Padar
- Attorney
- Blair Allen
- Attorney
- Diana L. Johnson
- Attorney
- James Uthmeier
- Attorney
- Helene S. Parnes
Key Dates
- Decision date
- 2026-05-01
What You Should Do Next
- 1
Consult appellate counsel about further review
If the appellant wishes to continue the challenge, consult counsel promptly about seeking discretionary review in the Florida Supreme Court and about applicable deadlines for such a petition.
- 2
Confirm mandate and post-appeal obligations
Coordinate with counsel and the trial court clerk to confirm issuance of the appellate mandate and any obligations that follow the affirmed judgment, such as sentencing, restitution, or case closure steps.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What did the court decide?
- The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's ruling and denied the relief sought by the appellant.
- Does this mean the appellant lost?
- Yes; the affirmation means the appellant's challenge to the lower-court decision failed at the appellate level.
- Did the court explain why it affirmed?
- No; the decision is a short per curiam affirmance and does not include an explanation of the court's reasoning.
- Can this be appealed further?
- Potentially, the appellant may seek review by the Florida Supreme Court, but any further appeal would depend on filing requirements and whether the higher court accepts review.
The above suggestions and answers are AI-generated for informational purposes only. They may contain errors. NoticeRegistry assumes no responsibility for their accuracy. Consult a qualified attorney before relying on them.
Full Filing Text
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
SCOTT WARREN CULLEN,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2024-2600
May 1, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Donna M. Padar,
Judge.
Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Diana L. Johnson, Assistant Public
Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes,
Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KELLY, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.